Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,410 questions · 8,901 findings · 1,091 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1,687 · 19%GRADE not reported 1,469 · 16.5%Very low 1,969 · 22.1%Low 2,060 · 23.1%Moderate 1,302 · 14.6%High 414 · 4.7%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

High snack consumption vs Low snack consumption

Plaque · Children aged 5-6 years in Ajman schools

High snack consumption was associated with a higher mean plaque score.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral Health of Children and Adolescents in the United Arab Emirates: A Systematic Review of the Past Decade. 2021 All outcomes
Overall
Adjusted difference 0.13 [0.02, 0.24]
1 study · 1036 participants
GRADE not reported

High‐dose vs low‐dose regimens of thrombolytic agents

30‐Day mortality · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 302 participants
Very low

High‐dose vs low‐dose regimens of thrombolytic agents

Vessel patency (at end of treatment) · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 302 participants
Very low

High‐dose vs low‐dose regimens of thrombolytic agents

Duration of thrombolysis (to end of treatment) · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 302 participants
Very low

High‐dose vs low‐dose regimens of thrombolytic agents

Stroke · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 302 participants
Very low

High‐dose vs low‐dose regimens of thrombolytic agents

Major bleeding · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 302 participants
Very low

Continuous infusion vs forced (or pulse) infusion of thrombolytic agents

30‐Day amputation‐free survival · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 304 participants
Very low

Continuous infusion vs forced (or pulse) infusion of thrombolytic agents

Amputation · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 164 participants
Very low

Continuous infusion vs forced (or pulse) infusion of thrombolytic agents

30‐Day mortality · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 304 participants
Very low

Continuous infusion vs forced (or pulse) infusion of thrombolytic agents

Vessel patency (up to 30 days) · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 304 participants
Very low

Continuous infusion vs forced (or pulse) infusion of thrombolytic agents

Duration of thrombolysis (to end of treatment) · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 304 participants
Very low

Continuous infusion vs forced (or pulse) infusion of thrombolytic agents

Stroke · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 304 participants
Very low

Continuous infusion vs forced (or pulse) infusion of thrombolytic agents

Major bleeding · patients with < 42 days' limb ischaemiaa

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 304 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

30‐Day amputation‐free survival · patients with less than 42 days' lower limb ischaemia

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

Amputation ( · patients with less than 42 days' lower limb ischaemia

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

30‐Day mortality · patients with less than 42 days' lower limb ischaemia

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

Vessel patency ( · patients with less than 42 days' lower limb ischaemia

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes vessel patency ( (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.2 [0.39, 3.69]
1 study · 70 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Duration of thrombolysis ( · patients with less than 42 days' lower limb ischaemia

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

CVA ( · patients with less than 42 days' lower limb ischaemia

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Major bleeding ( · patients with less than 42 days' lower limb ischaemia

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes major bleeding ( (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.25 [0.01, 4.9]
1 study · 70 participants
Very low