evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,801 questions · 4,079 findings · 473 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 669 · 16.4%GRADE not reported 852 · 20.9%Very low 738 · 18.1%Low 903 · 22.1%Moderate 716 · 17.6%High 201 · 4.9%

Enteral vs parenteral nutrition

All‐cause mortality · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

Enteral showed no clear difference in mortality compared with parenteral nutrition (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs enteral and parenteral nutrition

Ventilator‐free days up to day 28 · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs enteral and parenteral nutrition

Adverse events: aspiration (as reported by study authors at end of study · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs enteral and parenteral nutrition

Adverse events: sepsis (as reported by study authors at end of study · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs enteral and parenteral nutrition

Adverse events ‐ pneumonia · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

It is very uncertain whether enteral changes adverse events: pneumonia (as reported by study authors at end of… compared with enteral and parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs enteral and parenteral nutrition

Adverse events: Vomiting · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs parenteral nutrition

Number of ICU‐free days up to day 28 · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs parenteral nutrition

Adverse events: aspiration (as reported by study authors at end of study · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

It is very uncertain whether enteral changes adverse events: aspiration (as reported by study authors at end of… compared with parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs parenteral nutrition

Adverse events: sepsis (as reported by study authors at end of study · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

Enteral may leads to lower adverse events: sepsis (as reported by study authors at end of study compared with parenteral nutrition (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs parenteral nutrition

Adverse events ‐ pneumonia · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

Enteral showed no clear difference in adverse events: pneumonia (as reported by study authors at end of… compared with parenteral nutrition (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs parenteral nutrition

Adverse events: Vomiting · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

It is very uncertain whether enteral changes adverse events: vomiting (as reported by study authors at end of study compared with parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs enteral and parenteral nutrition

All‐cause mortality · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

Enteral showed no clear difference in mortality compared with enteral and parenteral nutrition (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs enteral and parenteral nutrition

Number of ICU‐free days up to day 28 · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Patient‐reported health information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Adherence to recommended clinical practice (0‐3 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient‐reported health information interventions probably leads to higher adherence to recommended clinical practice (0‐3 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Undesirable patient health outcomes · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

It is very uncertain whether patient information interventions changes undesirable patient health outcomes (0‐12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient information interventions showed no clear difference in patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients (0‐3 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review