evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,288 questions · 3,354 findings · 516 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 720 · 21.5%GRADE not reported 164 · 4.9%Very low 950 · 28.3%Low 932 · 27.8%Moderate 434 · 12.9%High 154 · 4.6%

PFMT added to electrical stimulation vs electrical stimulation alone (excluding implanted electrodes)

General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

PFMT added to electrical stimulation vs electrical stimulation alone (excluding implanted electrodes)

Number of women requiring further treatment such as surgery, drugs, mechanical devices (relapse) ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage vs no intervention/placebo plus nasogastric tube lavage

All‐cause mortality · people with acute UGIH

It is very uncertain whether erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage changes all‐cause mortality compared with no intervention/placebo plus nasogastric tube lavage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage vs no intervention/placebo plus nasogastric tube lavage

Rebleeding · people with acute UGIH

It is very uncertain whether erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage changes rebleeding compared with no intervention/placebo plus nasogastric tube lavage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia · pregnant women with GDM

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet showed no clear difference in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia compared with no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

Caesarean section · pregnant women with GDM

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

Induction of labour · pregnant women with GDM

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review