Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

328 questions · 332 findings · 35 reviews

No studies found 83 · 25%GRADE not reported 11 · 3.3%Very low 75 · 22.6%Low 105 · 31.6%Moderate 45 · 13.6%High 13 · 3.9%

Acupuncture vs NSAIDs

Function (short‐term) Harris function score from: 0 to 47 (higher is better function). · patients with hip osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs NSAIDs

Quality of life · patients with hip osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs NSAIDs

Number of participants reporting an adverse event · patients with hip osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs NSAIDs

Withdrawals due to adverse events · patients with hip osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs NSAIDs

Serious adverse events · patients with hip osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Celecoxib vs tNSAIDs

Number withdrawn due to adverse events · patients with osteoarthritis

Celecoxib showed no clear difference in number withdrawn due to adverse events compared with tNSAIDs (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Celecoxib vs tNSAIDs

Number of participants experiencing any serious adverse events · patients with osteoarthritis

It is very uncertain whether celecoxib changes number experiencing any serious adverse events compared with tNSAIDs (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Celecoxib vs tNSAIDs

Number experiencing gastro‐intestinal events (perforation, ulcer, bleeds) · patients with osteoarthritis

It is very uncertain whether celecoxib changes number experiencing gastro‐intestinal events (perforation, ulcer,… compared with tNSAIDs (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Celecoxib vs tNSAIDs

Cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke) · patients with osteoarthritis

It is very uncertain whether celecoxib changes number experiencing cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction,… compared with tNSAIDs (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Celecoxib vs NSAIDs

Cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke) · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Celecoxib showed no clear difference in cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke) compared with traditional NSAIDs (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Celecoxib vs NSAIDs

Incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers ≥ 3 mm · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Celecoxib probably leads to lower incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers ≥ 3 mm compared with traditional NSAIDs (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Celecoxib vs NSAIDs

Short‐term serious adverse events · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Celecoxib showed no clear difference in short‐term serious adverse events compared with traditional NSAIDs (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Celecoxib vs NSAIDs

Total number of withdrawals · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Celecoxib probably leads to lower total withdrawals; compared with traditional NSAIDs (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Celecoxib vs NSAIDs

Clinical improvement: American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Celecoxib showed no clear difference in clinical improvement: American College of Rheumatology 20%… compared with traditional NSAIDs (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Celecoxib vs NSAIDs

Pain A 0 t o 100 visual or numerical scale, where 0 equals no pain at all and 100 is the worst pain imaginable · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Morphine vs NSAIDs

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients undergoing knee arthroscopy
3 findings from 1 review