Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

720 questions · 751 findings · 105 reviews

No studies found 193 · 25.7%GRADE not reported 37 · 4.9%Very low 212 · 28.2%Low 193 · 25.7%Moderate 99 · 13.2%High 17 · 2.3%

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg vs macular laser

Change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) · macular edema in diabetes

It is very uncertain whether intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg changes change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) compared with macular laser (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg vs antiVEGF

Central retinal thickness μm (CRT) change at 1 year The aim of treatment is to reduce central retinal thickness so thinner is better. · macular edema in diabetes

It is very uncertain whether intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg changes change in central retinal thickness (micron) ‐ 12 months (negative… compared with antiVEGF (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs no intervention

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes live birth (or ongoing pregnancy) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs no intervention

Adverse events: ectopic pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes adverse events: ectopic pregnancy compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review