Intervention not reported
Walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s) and metres/minute (m/min). A higher score indicates faster walking. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s)… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Minute Walk Test · adults following hip fracture surgery
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales · adults following hip fracture surgery
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
TUG · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in TUG (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
6MWT · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention may leads to higher 6MWT (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
All · adults following hip fracture surgery
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales, using different mobility scales: mPPT (range 0 to 36), POMA (range 0 to 30). · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention probably leads to higher mobility scales, using different mobility scales: mPPT (range 0 to… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different scales: mBI (range 0 to 20), BI (range 0 to 100), FIM (range 18 to 126), NEADL (range 0 to 66). A higher score indicates better functioning. · adults following hip fracture surgery
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different scales: mBI (range 0… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
HRQoL Using EQ‐5D (range 0 to 1) and HOOS (range 0 to 100). A higher score indicates better quality of life. · adults following hip fracture surgery
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes HRQoL Using EQ‐5D (range 0 to 1) and HOOS (range 0 to 100). A higher… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mortality · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in mortality (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse event: number of people who were re‐admitted · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in adverse event: number of people who were re‐admitted (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Number of people who returned to living at pre‐fracture residence · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in number of people who returned to living at pre‐fracture residence (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mobility outcome · adults following hip fracture surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales, using different mobility scales: MILA (range 0 to 36), EMS (range 0 to 20), BBS (range 0 to 56), PPME (range 0 to 12), Koval (range 1 to 7). Higher values indicate better mobility (except MILA and Koval, where scale was inverted f... · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention probably leads to higher mobility scales, using different mobility scales: MILA (range 0 to… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency · people with focal seizures
High probably leads to higher 50% reduction in seizure frequency (responders) compared with low stimulation (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Treatment withdrawal · people with focal seizures
High showed no clear difference in withdrawals compared with low stimulation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Voice Alteration or Hoarseness · people with focal seizures
High probably leads to higher voice alteration or hoarseness compared with low stimulation (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cough · people with focal seizures
High showed no clear difference in cough compared with low stimulation (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dyspnea · people with focal seizures
High may leads to higher dyspnoea compared with low stimulation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain · people with focal seizures
High showed no clear difference in pain compared with low stimulation (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review