Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,749 questions · 17,858 findings · 1,266 reviews

No studies found 4,359 · 24.4%GRADE not reported 2,348 · 13.1%Very low 4,634 · 25.9%Low 4,000 · 22.4%Moderate 2,052 · 11.5%High 465 · 2.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Test‐based attendance vs routine isolation after contact with a SARS‐CoV‐2 positive person

Rates of symptomatic PCR‐positive SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (over 13‐week · school staff

It is very uncertain whether test‐based attendance changes rates of symptomatic PCR‐positive SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (over 13‐week compared with routine isolation after contact with a SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive person (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Test‐based attendance vs routine isolation after contact with a SARS‐CoV‐2 positive person

Confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection · school staff

It is very uncertain whether test‐based attendance changes rates of any PCR‐positive SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (over 13‐week compared with routine isolation after contact with a SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive person (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Test‐based attendance vs routine isolation after contact with a SARS‐CoV‐2 positive person

COVID‐related absenteeism from work Days absent per 1000 working days (over 13‐week · school staff

Test‐based attendance showed no clear difference in COVID‐related absenteeism from work Days absent per 1000 working… compared with routine isolation after contact with a SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive person (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review