Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,395 questions in 172 reviews · Gut

current versions
No studies 420 · 17.5%Ungraded 60 · 2.5%Very low 821 · 34.3%Low 602 · 25.1%Moderate 397 · 16.6%High 95 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Returning vs discarding the aspirated/drained gastric residual volume
Mortality (at the end of · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube
Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Returning vs discarding the aspirated/drained gastric residual volume
Pneumonia (at the end of · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube
Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Returning vs discarding the aspirated/drained gastric residual volume
Length of hospital stay (days) (at the end of · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube
Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
More frequent (less than eight hours) vs less frequent (eight hours or greater) monitoring of gastric residual volume
Pneumonia (until discontinued or up to 28 days) · adults receiving EN via nasogastric tube or gastrostomy tube
Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.08 [0.64, 1.83]1 study · 357 participantsVery low
More frequent (less than eight hours) vs less frequent (eight hours or greater) monitoring of gastric residual volume
Length of hospital stay (days) (at the end of · adults receiving EN via nasogastric tube or gastrostomy tube
Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 357 participantsVery low
No monitoring vs frequent monitoring (12 hours or less) of gastric residual volume
Mortality (at the end of · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube
Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.62, 1.23]2 studies · 500 participantsVery low
No monitoring vs frequent monitoring (12 hours or less) of gastric residual volume
Pneumonia (until discontinued or up to 28 days) · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube
Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.43, 1.13]1 study · 449 participantsVery low
No monitoring vs frequent monitoring (12 hours or less) of gastric residual volume
Length of hospital stay (days) (at the end of · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube
Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 500 participantsVery low
Higher threshold (500 mL per six hours or greater) vs lower threshold (less than 500 mL per six hours) at time of aspiration
Mortality (at the end of · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube
Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.74, 1.38]1 study · 322 participantsVery low
Higher threshold (500 mL per six hours or greater) vs lower threshold (less than 500 mL per six hours) at time of aspiration
Pneumonia (until discontinued or up to 28 days) · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube
Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.72, 1.46]1 study · 322 participantsVery low
Higher threshold (500 mL per six hours or greater) vs lower threshold (less than 500 mL per six hours) at time of aspiration
Length of hospital stay (days) (at the end of · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube
Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 322 participantsVery low
IV iron sucrose vs oral iron sulphate
Number of responders ‐ active or inactive disease (6 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.22 [0.95, 1.57]2 studies · 137 participantsLow
Oral ferric maltol vs oral placebo
Serious adverse events ‐ mild disease to quiescent (up to 52 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.15, 6.88]1 study · 128 participantsVery low
Oral ferric maltol vs IV ferric carboxymaltose
Number of responders ‐ disease activity not stated (12 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.65, 1.06]1 study · 252 participantsLow
Oral ferric maltol vs IV ferric carboxymaltose
Serious adverse events (12 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 2.95 [0.98, 8.91]1 study · 252 participantsVery low
IV ferric carboxymaltose vs oral iron sulphate
Number of responders ‐ mild to moderate disease (16 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [0.95, 1.43]1 study · 200 participantsLow
IV ferric carboxymaltose vs oral iron sulphate
Serious adverse events ‐ mild to moderate disease (16 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 8.81 [0.52, 149.07]1 study · 200 participantsVery low
IV iron isomaltoside vs oral iron sulphate
Number of responders ‐ remission or mild disease (8 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.12 [0.93, 1.34]1 study · 338 participantsLow
IV iron isomaltoside vs oral iron sulphate
Serious adverse events ‐ remission or mild disease (8 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 4.02 [0.51, 31.73]1 study · 338 participantsVery low
IM erythropoietin vs oral placebo
Number of responders ‐ active disease (12 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 3.5 [1.44, 8.48]1 study · 34 participantsVery low
IM erythropoietin vs oral placebo
Serious adverse events · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intravenous preparations vs oral preparations
Number of responders · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [1.05, 1.31]5 studies · 927 participantsLow
IV iron sucrose vs oral iron sulphate
Serious adverse events ‐ mild to moderate disease (20 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 3.07 [0.13, 73.32]1 study · 91 participantsVery low
Intravenous preparations vs oral preparations
Withdrawal due to adverse events · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.39 [0.2, 0.74]5 studies · 927 participantsLow
Oral iron sulphate vs oral iron hydroxide polymaltose complex
Number of responders ‐ active or inactive disease (14 days) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 41 participantsVery low
Oral iron sulphate vs oral iron hydroxide polymaltose complex
Serious adverse events ‐ active or inactive disease (14 days) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 2.86 [0.32, 25.24]1 study · 41 participantsVery low
IV ferric carboxymaltose vs IV iron sucrose
Number of responders ‐ mild to moderate disease (12 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.25 [1.06, 1.46]1 study · 485 participantsModerate
IV ferric carboxymaltose vs IV iron sucrose
Serious adverse events ‐ mild to moderate disease (12 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 2.94 [0.12, 71.78]1 study · 485 participantsVery low
IM erythropoietin + IV iron sucrose vs IV iron sucrose + IM placebo
Number of responders ‐ disease activity not stated (12 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.2 [0.9, 1.61]1 study · 40 participantsLow
IM erythropoietin + IV iron sucrose vs IV iron sucrose + IM placebo
Serious adverse events ‐ disease activity not stated (12 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Oral ferric maltol vs oral placebo
Number of responders ‐ mild disease to quiescent (up to 52 weeks) · IBD patients
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
RR 73 [4.58, 1164.36]1 study · 128 participantsVery low
Low FODMAP diet vs sham diet
Treatment success as defined by the authors · people with inflammatory bowel disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medicine‐separated moxibustion combined with acupuncture vs wheat bran‐separated moxibustion combined with shallow acupuncture
Abdominal pain frequency or change in frequency · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medicine‐separated moxibustion combined with acupuncture vs wheat bran‐separated moxibustion combined with shallow acupuncture
Abdominal pain intensity or change in intensity · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medicine‐separated moxibustion combined with acupuncture vs wheat bran‐separated moxibustion combined with shallow acupuncture
Withdrawals due to adverse events · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 102 participantsVery low
Mindfulness with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) vs no treatment (both groups received standard medical therapy)
Treatment success as defined by the authors · people with inflammatory bowel disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mindfulness with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) vs no treatment (both groups received standard medical therapy)
Pain frequency and intensity (measured as part of the 0‐500 point IBS‐SSS questionnaire) · people with inflammatory bowel disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 66 participantsVery low
Mindfulness with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) vs no treatment (both groups received standard medical therapy)
Withdrawal due to adverse events · people with inflammatory bowel disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 66 participantsVery low
soft non‐manipulative osteopathic treatment vs no intervention
Treatment success as defined by the authors · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
soft non‐manipulative osteopathic treatment vs no intervention
Abdominal pain frequency or change in frequency · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
soft non‐manipulative osteopathic treatment vs no intervention
Pain intensity (0‐10cm visual analogue scale) · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
soft non‐manipulative osteopathic treatment vs no intervention
Withdrawals due to adverse events · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Low FODMAP diet vs sham diet
Pain frequency IBD (measured in days of pain on the IBS‐SSS questionnaire) · people with inflammatory bowel disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsVery low
Directed stress management (it is unclear whether these interventions replaced standard treatment or were added to standard treatment) vs standard treatment
Treatment success as defined by the authors · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Directed stress management (it is unclear whether these interventions replaced standard treatment or were added to standard treatment) vs standard treatment
Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Directed stress management (it is unclear whether these interventions replaced standard treatment or were added to standard treatment) vs standard treatment
Pain intensity (author‐derived formula based on a 1‐3 point scale) · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Directed stress management (it is unclear whether these interventions replaced standard treatment or were added to standard treatment) vs standard treatment
Withdrawals due to adverse events · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Self‐directed stress management (it is unclear whether these interventions replaced standard treatment or were added to standard treatment) vs standard treatment
Treatment success as defined by the authors · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Self‐directed stress management (it is unclear whether these interventions replaced standard treatment or were added to standard treatment) vs standard treatment
Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Self‐directed stress management (it is unclear whether these interventions replaced standard treatment or were added to standard treatment) vs standard treatment
Pain intensity (author‐derived formula based on a 1‐3 point scale) · people with Crohn's disease
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low