Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,361 questions in 120 reviews · Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems

current versions
No studies 286 · 21%Ungraded 61 · 4.5%Very low 381 · 28%Low 381 · 28%Moderate 228 · 16.8%High 24 · 1.8%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support vs the same dose of overground walking training
Mobility Measured by: 6‐minute walk test or gait analysis via Vicon, reported in m/s Timing of outcome assessment: change scores from baseline to 6 weeks or postintervention scores at 12 weeks · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to III and between 3 and 12 years of age
Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 55 participantsModerate
Mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support vs the same dose of overground walking training
Gross motor function Measured by: GMFM‐E (higher score = greater performance), reported as % Timing of outcome assessment: change from baseline to 6 weeks · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to III and between 3 and 12 years of age
Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsModerate
Mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support vs the same dose of overground walking training
Adverse events (not measured) · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to III and between 3 and 12 years of age
Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support vs the same dose of overground walking training
Participation Measured by: PEDI‐mobility score (total scores range from 0 to 59; higher scores = greater participation) Timing of outcome assessment: change scores from baseline to 6 weeks · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to III and between 3 and 12 years of age
Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsModerate
Resilience interventions vs control conditions
Resilience Measured by: investigators measured resilience using different instruments; higher scores mean higher resilience Timing of outcome assessment: post‐intervention · healthcare students, including students in training for health professions delivering direct medical care (e.g.…
Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted9 studies · 561 participantsVery low
Resilience interventions vs control conditions
Mental health and well‐being: anxiety Measured by: investigators measured anxiety using different instruments; lower scores mean lower anxiety Timing of outcome assessment: post‐intervention · healthcare students, including students in training for health professions delivering direct medical care (e.g.…
Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 362 participantsVery low
Resilience interventions vs control conditions
Mental health and well‐being: depressionMeasured by: investigators measured depression using different instruments; lower scores mean lower depression Timing of outcome assessment: post‐intervention · healthcare students, including students in training for health professions delivering direct medical care (e.g.…
Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 332 participantsVery low
Resilience interventions vs control conditions
Mental health and well‐being: stress or stress perception: Measured by: investigators measured stress or stress perception using different instruments; lower scores mean lower stress or stress perception Timing of outcome assessment: post‐interven... · healthcare students, including students in training for health professions delivering direct medical care (e.g.…
Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 420 participantsVery low
Resilience interventions vs control conditions
Mental health and well‐being: well‐being or quality of life: Measured by: investigators measured well‐being or quality of life using different instruments; higher scores mean higher well‐being or quality of life Timing of outcome assessment: post‐... · healthcare students, including students in training for health professions delivering direct medical care (e.g.…
Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 251 participantsVery low
Resilience interventions vs control conditions
Adverse events · healthcare students, including students in training for health professions delivering direct medical care (e.g.…
Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 566 participantsVery low
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Instrumented gait analysis (kinematics) (not measured) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Function · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 191 participantsVery low
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Range of motion (passive ankle dorsiflexion) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 272 participantsVery low
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Satisfaction (not measured) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Spasticity (ankle plantarflexors) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 226 participantsVery low
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Adverse events · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Instrumented gait analysis (kinematics) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Observational gait analysis (not measured) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Function · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 199 participantsVery low
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Range of motion (passive ankle dorsiflexion) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 250 participantsVery low
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Satisfaction · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsVery low
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Observational gait analysis (not measured) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Spasticity (ankle plantarflexors) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 258 participantsVery low
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Adverse events · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Instrumented gait analysis (peak ankle dorsiflexion in stance) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 19 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Observational gait analysis (improvement) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.66 [1.16, 2.37]4 studies · 261 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Function · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 305 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Range of motion (passive ankle dorsiflexion) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 291 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Satisfaction · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 41 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Spasticity (ankle plantarflexors) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 156 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Adverse events · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.29 [0.87, 1.93]12 studies · 918 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Instrumented gait analysis (kinematics) (not measured) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Function · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 123 participantsVery low
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Observational gait analysis (improvement) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.9 [1.32, 2.74]3 studies · 248 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Function · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 327 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Range of motion (passive ankle dorsiflexion) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 150 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Satisfaction · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 74 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Spasticity (ankle plantarflexors) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 144 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Adverse events · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Instrumented gait analysis (kinematics) (not measured) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Observational gait analysis (not measured) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Function · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 91 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Range of motion (passive ankle dorsiflexion) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy
Range of motion (passive ankle dorsiflexion) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 186 participantsVery low
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Satisfaction · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 33 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Spasticity (ankle plantarflexors) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 42 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs placebo or sham
Adverse events · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BoNT‐A vs serial casting
Instrumented gait analysis (peak ankle dorsiflexion in stance) (degrees) · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 21 participantsLow
BoNT‐A vs serial casting
Observational gait analysis · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsModerate
BoNT‐A vs serial casting
Function · children with CP
Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsModerate