Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

322 questions · 329 findings · 31 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 90 · 27.4%GRADE not reported 52 · 15.8%Very low 80 · 24.3%Low 63 · 19.1%Moderate 38 · 11.6%High 6 · 1.8%

Constant CGM vs Intermittent CGM

Caesarean section · women with pre‐existing diabetes

It is very uncertain whether constant CGM changes caesarean section compared with intermittent CGM (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.77 [0.33, 1.79]
1 study · 25 participants
Very low

Constant CGM vs Intermittent CGM

Large‐for‐gestational age · women with pre‐existing diabetes

1 finding from 1 review

Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Constant CGM vs Intermittent CGM

Perinatal mortality · women with pre‐existing diabetes

1 finding from 1 review

Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

Morbidity · Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 523 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Well‐being · Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 928 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Patient satisfaction · Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 928 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Hypoglycaemic episodes · Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 2492 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Costs · Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 514 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

HbA1c [%] · Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 2324 participants
Moderate

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) vs standard monitoring

Awareness Postoperative interview · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) showed no clear difference in awareness Postoperative interview compared with standard clinical and electronic monitoring (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.98 [0.59, 1.62]
9 studies · 34744 participants
Low

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) vs standard monitoring

Adverse effects of intraoperative wakefulness and/or postoperative awareness (i.e. post‐traumatic stress syndrome, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, etc.) · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) vs standard monitoring

Awareness: definite and possible Postoperative interview · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) showed no clear difference in awareness: definite and possible Postoperative interview compared with standard clinical and electronic monitoring (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.96 [0.35, 2.65]
5 studies · 34181 participants
Low

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) vs standard monitoring

Awareness: definite Postoperative interview · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) showed no clear difference in awareness: definite Postoperative interview compared with standard clinical and electronic monitoring (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.6 [0.13, 2.75]
5 studies · 34181 participants
Low

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) vs standard monitoring

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Shunting vs no shunting

Any stroke during surgery (best‐case) · patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease

Shunting showed no clear difference in any stroke during surgery (best‐case) compared with no shunting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.42 [0.16, 1.07]
3 studies · 655 participants
Low

Shunting vs no shunting

Any stroke during surgery (worst‐case) · patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease

Shunting showed no clear difference in any stroke during surgery (worst‐case) compared with no shunting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.32 [0.52, 3.38]
3 studies · 655 participants
Low

Setting of BP measurement: self‐measurement vs conventional clinic measurement

Maternal outcomes · pregnant women with chronic or gestational hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Setting and techniques for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Setting of BP measurement: self‐measurement vs conventional clinic measurement

Neonatal mortality · pregnant women with chronic or gestational hypertension

Setting of BP measurement: self‐measurement showed no clear difference in neonatal death compared with conventional clinic measurement (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Setting and techniques for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.54 [0.06, 37.25]
1 study · 154 participants
Low

Setting of BP measurement: self‐measurement vs conventional clinic measurement

Perinatal mortality · pregnant women with chronic or gestational hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Setting and techniques for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found