What do systematic reviews say?

Exercise prescription plus the use of a wearable fitness tracker vs exercise

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Digital technology for delivering and monitoring exercise programs for people with cystic fibrosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Exercise prescription plus the use of a wearable fitness tracker vs exercise

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Digital technology for delivering and monitoring exercise programs for people with cystic fibrosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Exercise prescription plus the use of a wearable fitness tracker vs exercise

• Digital technology for delivering and monitoring exercise programs for people with cystic fibrosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 40 participants
  Very low

Exercise prescription plus the use of a wearable fitness tracker vs exercise

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Digital technology for delivering and monitoring exercise programs for people with cystic fibrosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Wearable fitness tracker plus text message for personalized feedback and goal setting vs wearable fitness tracker alone

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Digital technology for delivering and monitoring exercise programs for people with cystic fibrosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Wearable fitness tracker plus text message for personalized feedback and goal setting vs wearable fitness tracker alone

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Digital technology for delivering and monitoring exercise programs for people with cystic fibrosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Constant CGM vs Intermittent CGM

• Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Constant CGM vs Intermittent CGM

It is very uncertain whether constant CGM changes caesarean section compared with intermittent CGM (very low certainty).

• Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.77 [0.33, 1.79]
  1 study · 25 participants
  Very low

Constant CGM vs Intermittent CGM

• Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Constant CGM vs Intermittent CGM

• Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

• Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 523 participants
  Moderate

Intervention not reported

• Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 928 participants
  Moderate

Intervention not reported

• Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 928 participants
  Moderate

Intervention not reported

• Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 2492 participants
  Moderate

Intervention not reported

• Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 514 participants
  Moderate

Intervention not reported

• Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 2324 participants
  Moderate

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) vs standard monitoring

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) showed no clear difference in awareness Postoperative interview compared with standard clinical and electronic monitoring (low certainty).

• Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.98 [0.59, 1.62]
  9 studies · 34744 participants
  Low

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) vs standard monitoring

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) vs standard monitoring

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) showed no clear difference in awareness: definite and possible Postoperative interview compared with standard clinical and electronic monitoring (low certainty).

• Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.96 [0.35, 2.65]
  5 studies · 34181 participants
  Low