One‐food elimination diet vs six‐food elimination diet
Histological improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 129 participantsVery low
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
966 questions · 1,015 findings · 90 reviews · Headline outcomes only
No studies found 256 · 25.2%GRADE not reported 62 · 6.1%Very low 271 · 26.7%Low 269 · 26.5%Moderate 111 · 10.9%High 46 · 4.5%
One‐food elimination diet vs six‐food elimination diet
Endoscopic improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
One‐food elimination diet vs six‐food elimination diet
Endoscopic improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 129 participantsVery low
One‐food elimination diet vs six‐food elimination diet
Withdrawals due to adverse events · active EoE pediatric patients
It is very uncertain whether one‐food elimination diet changes withdrawals due to adverse events compared with six‐food elimination diet (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.62 [0.11, 3.57]1 study · 129 participantsVery low
Dietary interventions vs diet and physical activity interventions combined
Body‐mass index (BMI) · children aged 6‐12 years
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 3971 participantsHigh
Dietary interventions vs diet and physical activity interventions combined
Body‐mass index z score (zBMI) · children aged 6‐12 years
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 3971 participantsHigh
Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet
Mean GI symptom scores (IBDQ‐B) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsLow
Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet
Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet
Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.79 [0.45, 1.38]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet
QoL · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in QOL scores (IBDQ) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
- Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyMD 4.61 study · 50 participantsLow
- Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 119 participantsGRADE not reported
- Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyMD 2.41 study · 76 participantsLow
Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet
Diarrhoea (grade 1+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 1+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.74 [0.45, 1.23]1 study · 119 participantsLow
Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet
Mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 70 participantsLow
Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet
Diarrhoea · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Ketogenic diet (KD) vs usual care
Seizure freedom · children (aged 1 to 18 years) with drug‐resistant epilepsy
It is very uncertain whether ketogenic diet (KD) changes seizure freedom (100% reduction in seizure frequency) compared with usual care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 3.16 [1.2, 8.35]4 studies · 385 participantsVery low
Ketogenic diet (KD) vs usual care
Cognition and behaviour · adults (aged 16 years and over) with drug‐resistant epilepsy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Ketogenic diet (KD) vs usual care
Quality of life · adults (aged 16 years and over) with drug‐resistant epilepsy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Ketogenic diet (KD) vs usual care
Treatment withdrawal · adults (aged 16 years and over) with drug‐resistant epilepsy
It is very uncertain whether ketogenic diet (KD) changes treatment withdrawal compared with usual care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 5.38 [0.42, 69.53]2 studies · 141 participantsVery low
Ketogenic diet (KD) vs usual care
50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency · children (aged 1 to 18 years) with drug‐resistant epilepsy
1 finding from 1 review
- 5.8 [3.48, 9.65]4 studies · 385 participantsLow
Ketogenic diet (KD) vs usual care
Adverse effects · children (aged 1 to 18 years) with drug‐resistant epilepsy
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted5 studies · 425 participantsLow
Ketogenic diet (KD) vs usual care
Cognition and behaviour · children (aged 1 to 18 years) with drug‐resistant epilepsy
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 57 participantsVery low