Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

313 questions · 322 findings · 26 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 58 · 18%GRADE not reported 16 · 5%Very low 41 · 12.7%Low 94 · 29.2%Moderate 83 · 25.8%High 30 · 9.3%

Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs no prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures (colloid, crystalloid, placebo, or no treatment)

Serious adverse events measured by surgery or procedure‐related complications within 30 days ‐ not reported · patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery/invasive procedures

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylactic plasma transfusion for patients without inherited bleeding disorders or anticoagulant use undergoing… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs no prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures (colloid, crystalloid, placebo, or no treatment)

Quality of life ‐ not reported · patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery/invasive procedures

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylactic plasma transfusion for patients without inherited bleeding disorders or anticoagulant use undergoing… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs alternative haemostatic agents

All‐cause mortality up to 30 days ‐ not reported · patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery/invasive procedures

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylactic plasma transfusion for patients without inherited bleeding disorders or anticoagulant use undergoing… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs alternative haemostatic agents

Bleeding ‐ major/excessive · patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery/invasive procedures

It is very uncertain whether prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures changes major bleeding within 24 hours № of participants: 21 (1 RCT) compared with alternative haemostatic agents (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylactic plasma transfusion for patients without inherited bleeding disorders or anticoagulant use undergoing… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Intervention not reported

APX vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 4930 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

RVX (high dose, 10 mg to 20 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 1546 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

RVX (low dose, 2.5 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1399 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

DAB (low dose, 110 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1962 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

DAB (high dose, 150 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1527 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

APX vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 4865 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

RVX (high dose, 10 mg to 20 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 1546 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

RVX (low dose, 2.5 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1403 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

DAB (low dose, 110 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1962 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

DAB (high dose, 150 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1527 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

APX vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 4930 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

RVX (high dose, 10 mg to 20 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 1542 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

RVX (high dose, 10 mg to 20 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1393 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

RVX (low dose, 2.5 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1403 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

DAB (low dose, 110 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1962 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

DAB (high dose, 150 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1527 participants
Low