Cochrane · systematic review · CD012745

Prophylactic plasma transfusion for patients without inherited bleeding disorders or anticoagulant use undergoing non‐cardiac surgery or invasive procedures

Huber, J, Stanworth, SJ, Doree, C, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

HaematologyAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
21
current version
GRADE rated
10
No studies
11
Included studies
NR
No studies 11 · 52.4%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 9 · 42.9%Low 1 · 4.8%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures compared to no prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures (colloid, crystalloid, placebo, or no treatment) for patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery or invasive procedures

Population: patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery or invasive procedures
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
All‐cause mortality up to 30 days № of participants: 72 (1 RCT)
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs no prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures (colloid, crystalloid, placebo, or no treatment)
RR 0.38 [0.13, 1.1]NRVery low
Downgraded: indirectness
Major bleeding within 24 hours № of participants: 148 (2 RCTs)
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs no prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures (colloid, crystalloid, placebo, or no treatment)
RR 0.33NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Number of transfusions per participant within 7 days № of participants: 76 (1 RCT)
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs no prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures (colloid, crystalloid, placebo, or no treatment)
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Number of individuals requiring a transfusion within 7 days № of participants: 72 (1 RCT)
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs no prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures (colloid, crystalloid, placebo, or no treatment)
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Serious adverse events measured by plasma transfusion‐related complications within 24 hours № of participants: 76 (1 RCT)
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs no prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures (colloid, crystalloid, placebo, or no treatment)
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Serious adverse events measured by surgery or procedure‐related complications within 30 days ‐ not reported
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs no prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures (colloid, crystalloid, placebo, or no treatment)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs no prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures (colloid, crystalloid, placebo, or no treatment)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures compared to alternative haemostatic agents for patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery/invasive procedures

Population: patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery/invasive procedures
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
All‐cause mortality up to 30 days ‐ not reported
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs alternative haemostatic agents
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Major bleeding within 24 hours № of participants: 21 (1 RCT)
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs alternative haemostatic agents
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Number of transfusions per participant within 7 days ‐ not reported
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs alternative haemostatic agents
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Number of individuals requiring a transfusion within 7 days ‐ not reported
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs alternative haemostatic agents
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events measured by plasma transfusion‐related complications within 24 hours № of participants: 21 (1 RCT)
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs alternative haemostatic agents
RR 9.82 [0.59, 162.24]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Serious adverse events measured by surgery or procedure‐related complications within 30 days ‐ not reported
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs alternative haemostatic agents
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Prophylactic plasma transfusion before surgery/invasive procedures vs alternative haemostatic agents
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Thromboelastography threshold compared to standard of care (laboratory parameters) for patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery or invasive procedures

Population: patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery/invasive procedures
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
All‐cause mortality up to 30 days ‐ not reported
Thromboelastography threshold vs standard of care (laboratory parameters)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Major bleeding within 24 hours № of participants: 60 (1 RCT)
Thromboelastography threshold vs standard of care (laboratory parameters)
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.87]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Number of transfusions per participant within 7 days ‐ not reported
Thromboelastography threshold vs standard of care (laboratory parameters)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Number of individuals requiring a transfusion within 7 days № of participants: 60 (1 RCT)
Thromboelastography threshold vs standard of care (laboratory parameters)
RR 0.18 [0.08, 0.39]NRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events measured by plasma transfusion‐related complications within 24 hours № of participants: 60 (1 RCT)
Thromboelastography threshold vs standard of care (laboratory parameters)
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.87]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events measured by surgery or procedure‐related complications within 30 days ‐ not reported
Thromboelastography threshold vs standard of care (laboratory parameters)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Thromboelastography threshold vs standard of care (laboratory parameters)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies