Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,097 questions · 3,266 findings · 631 reviews

No studies found 430 · 13.2%GRADE not reported 193 · 5.9%Very low 995 · 30.5%Low 904 · 27.7%Moderate 591 · 18.1%High 153 · 4.7%

Lower‐dose methylnaltrexone vs higher dose

Laxation response: risk of spontaneous rescue‐free bowel movements in the medium termb · people receiving palliative care irrespective of whether they had cancer with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

It is very uncertain whether methylnaltrexone lower dose changes laxation response: risk of spontaneous rescue‐free bowel… compared with higher dose (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lower‐dose methylnaltrexone vs higher dose

Laxation response: patient assessment of change in bowel status at the end of trial · people receiving palliative care irrespective of whether they had cancer with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

Methylnaltrexone lower dose showed no clear difference in laxation response: patient assessment of change in bowel statusgat… compared with higher dose (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lower‐dose methylnaltrexone vs higher dose

Symptoms of opioid withdrawal in the medium term · people receiving palliative care irrespective of whether they had cancer with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

Methylnaltrexone lower dose showed no clear difference in symptoms of opioid withdrawal in the medium term compared with higher dose (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lower‐dose methylnaltrexone vs higher dose

Adverse events · people receiving palliative care irrespective of whether they had cancer with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

Methylnaltrexone lower dose showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with higher dose (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low dose naldemedine vs higher dose

Laxation response: risk of spontaneous rescue‐free bowel movements in the short terma · people with cancer irrespective of whether receiving palliative care and with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Low dose naldemedine vs higher dose

Laxation response: risk of spontaneous rescue‐free bowel movements in the medium termb · people with cancer irrespective of whether receiving palliative care and with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

Low dose naldemedine may leads to lower laxation response: risk of spontaneous rescue‐free bowel movements… compared with higher doses (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low dose naldemedine vs higher dose

Laxation response: patient assessment of change in bowel status at the end of trial · people with cancer irrespective of whether receiving palliative care and with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Low vs high 17ß‐oestradiol dose

Uterine volume (cm³) · young women with Turner syndrome who have completed pubertal induction
2 findings from 1 review

Lower blood pressure targets vs standard blood pressure targets

Total serious adverse events · cardiovascular disease with high blood pressure

Lower blood pressure targets showed no clear difference in total serious adverse events compared with standard blood pressure targets (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lower blood pressure targets vs standard blood pressure targets

Cardiovascular mortality · cardiovascular disease with high blood pressure

Lower blood pressure targets showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality compared with standard blood pressure targets (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lower blood pressure targets vs standard blood pressure targets

Withdrawals due to adverse events · cardiovascular disease with high blood pressure

It is very uncertain whether lower blood pressure targets changes participant withdrawals due to adverse effects compared with standard blood pressure targets (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Number of reported cases of child abuse and neglect (professionals' self‐report, actual cases) Time of outcome assessment: short term (3 months postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…
1 finding from 1 review