Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

5,762 questions in 263 reviews · Dental caries

current versions
No studies 321 · 5.6%Ungraded 4,450 · 77.2%Very low 455 · 7.9%Low 297 · 5.2%Moderate 200 · 3.5%High 39 · 0.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dental fillings (restorations) vs No treatment
Outcome NR · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · Minimum 6 months follow-up
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
"No studies were found that compared restorations versus extractions or no treatment as an intervention in children with caries in the primary dentition."NRNo studies
Resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer) vs Amalgam
Replacement (failure) of Class II restoration at 12 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 12 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
OR 0.64 [0.10, 4.15]1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Aesthetic (resin-veneered) crowns vs Conventional metal (stainless steel) crowns
Gingival health at 6 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 6 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
OR 0.30 [0.01, 8.32]1 study · 22 participantsUngraded
Conditioning and sealing with an adhesive resin (smear-removing bonding system) vs Conventional calcium hydroxide lining
Maintenance of pulp vitality (freedom from pulpal breakdown) up to 36 months · Healthy adults with asymptomatic posterior permanent teeth with deep caries and a vital (non-exposed) pulp requiring… · 36 months
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Whitworth 2005: 602 teeth randomised; 39 emergency recalls over the 36 months after restoration, with pulp breakdown associated with 16 teeth. The authors concluded that "dentists should be confident that pulps will be…1 study · 602 participantsUngraded
Glycerrhetinic acid/antibiotic mixture vs Calcium hydroxide
Clinical success (survival free of symptoms) at 24 months · Adults with asymptomatic teeth with vital carious pulp exposures · 24 months
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Shovelton 1971 (Analysis 1.1): 275 teeth followed for 2 years (235 at 6 months, 160 at 12 months, 85 analysed at 24 months). Success rates 50% to 80%. Ledermix and calcium hydroxide had the highest success rates,…1 study · 275 participantsUngraded
Prefabricated metal post and core (Category II) vs Metal custom-cast post and core (Category I)
Outcome NR · Participants with permanent endodontically-treated (root-filled) teeth for which a post is indicated to retain the… · Minimum 6 months (planned)
Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth (2007) · Cochrane
No included trial compared metal-cast posts with prefabricated metal posts (a planned primary comparison); no eligible study identified.0 studiesNo studies
Ledermix (corticosteroid/antibiotic pulp-capping cement) vs Calcium hydroxide
Clinical success (survival free of symptoms) at 24 months · Adults with asymptomatic teeth with vital carious pulp exposures · 24 months
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Shovelton 1971 (Analysis 1.1): 275 teeth followed for 2 years (235 at 6 months, 160 at 12 months, 85 analysed at 24 months). Success rates 50% to 80%. Ledermix and calcium hydroxide had the highest success rates,…1 study · 275 participantsUngraded
Ledermix (corticosteroid/antibiotic pulp-capping cement) vs Glycerrhetinic acid/antibiotic mixture
Clinical success (survival free of symptoms) at 24 months · Adults with asymptomatic teeth with vital carious pulp exposures · 24 months
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Shovelton 1971 (Analysis 1.1): 275 teeth followed for 2 years (235 at 6 months, 160 at 12 months, 85 analysed at 24 months). Success rates 50% to 80%. Ledermix and calcium hydroxide had the highest success rates,…1 study · 275 participantsUngraded
Metal post of one alloy type vs Metal post of a different alloy type
Outcome NR · Participants with permanent endodontically-treated (root-filled) teeth for which a post is indicated to retain the… · Minimum 6 months (planned)
Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth (2007) · Cochrane
No included trial evaluated alloy type in metal posts (a planned secondary comparison); no eligible study identified.0 studiesNo studies
Potassium nitrate/dimethyl isosorbide/polycarboxylate cement (KNO3/DMI/PCa) vs Potassium nitrate/polycarboxylate cement (KNO3/PCa)
Clinical success (absence of periapical pathology, tenderness to pressure and fistula formation) at 24 months · Adults with asymptomatic vital pulpal exposures from caries · 24 months
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Hodosh 2003 (Analysis 3.1): all 18 patients receiving KNO3/DMI/PCa responded favourably (0/18 developed clinical symptoms) versus 9/17 in the KNO3/PCa group; symptomatic teeth required endodontic therapy or extraction.…1 study · 35 participantsUngraded
Cast post and core with a diaphragm vs Cast post and core without a diaphragm
Outcome NR · Participants with permanent endodontically-treated (root-filled) teeth for which a post is indicated to retain the… · Minimum 6 months (planned)
Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth (2007) · Cochrane
No included trial evaluated the presence of a diaphragm in cast posts (a planned secondary comparison); no eligible study identified.0 studiesNo studies
Dycal (calcium hydroxide material) vs Cavitec (zinc oxide eugenol material)
Clinical symptoms at 12 months · Adults (aged 20 to 60 years, mean 27) with deep carious lesions in permanent teeth (indirect or direct pulp capping,… · 12 months, Complete caries removal
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Analysis 2.2 (clinical symptoms at 12 months following complete caries removal, Dycal vs Cavitec). Fitzgerald 1991: 151 teeth in 55 patients (analysis at tooth level, not patient level); substantial attrition (11 teeth…1 study · 151 participantsUngraded
Calcium hydroxide vs Zinc oxide eugenol
Clinical success (survival free of symptoms) at 24 months · Adults with asymptomatic teeth with vital carious pulp exposures · 24 months
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Shovelton 1971 (Analysis 1.1): 275 teeth followed for 2 years (235 at 6 months, 160 at 12 months, 85 analysed at 24 months). Success rates 50% to 80%. Ledermix and calcium hydroxide had the highest success rates,…1 study · 275 participantsUngraded
Life (calcium hydroxide material) vs Cavitec (zinc oxide eugenol material)
Clinical symptoms at 12 months · Adults (aged 20 to 60 years, mean 27) with deep carious lesions in permanent teeth (indirect or direct pulp capping,… · 12 months, Complete caries removal
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Analysis 2.2 (clinical symptoms at 12 months following complete caries removal, Life vs Cavitec). Fitzgerald 1991: 151 teeth in 55 patients (analysis at tooth level, not patient level); substantial attrition (11 teeth…1 study · 151 participantsUngraded
Life (calcium hydroxide pulp-capping material) vs Dycal (calcium hydroxide pulp-capping material)
Clinical symptoms at 12 months · Adults (aged 20 to 60 years, mean 27) with deep carious lesions in permanent teeth (indirect or direct pulp capping,… · 12 months, Complete caries removal
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Analysis 2.2 (clinical symptoms at 12 months following complete caries removal, Life vs Dycal). Fitzgerald 1991: 151 teeth in 55 patients (analysis at tooth level, not patient level); substantial attrition (11 teeth…1 study · 151 participantsUngraded
Potassium nitrate/dimethyl isosorbide/polycarboxylate cement (KNO3/DMI/PCa) vs Polycarboxylate cement (PCa) alone
Clinical success (absence of periapical pathology, tenderness to pressure and fistula formation) at 24 months · Adults with asymptomatic vital pulpal exposures from caries · 24 months
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Hodosh 2003 (Analysis 3.1): all 18 patients receiving KNO3/DMI/PCa responded favourably (0/18 developed clinical symptoms) versus 10/12 in the PCa group. "The results in groups two and three were statistically…1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Glycerrhetinic acid/antibiotic mixture vs Zinc oxide eugenol
Clinical success (survival free of symptoms) at 24 months · Adults with asymptomatic teeth with vital carious pulp exposures · 24 months
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Shovelton 1971 (Analysis 1.1): 275 teeth followed for 2 years (235 at 6 months, 160 at 12 months, 85 analysed at 24 months). Success rates 50% to 80%. Ledermix and calcium hydroxide had the highest success rates,…1 study · 275 participantsUngraded
Post and core restoration with a ferrule vs Post and core restoration without a ferrule
Outcome NR · Participants with permanent endodontically-treated (root-filled) teeth for which a post is indicated to retain the… · Minimum 6 months (planned)
Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth (2007) · Cochrane
No included trial evaluated the presence of a ferrule (a planned secondary comparison); no eligible study identified.0 studiesNo studies
Non-metal carbon-fibre post and core (Category III; Composipost) vs Metal custom-cast post and core (Category I; gold alloy)
Clinical/technical failure (root fracture) · Participants with permanent endodontically-treated (root-filled) teeth for which a post is indicated to retain the… · 48 months (4 years)
Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.05 [0.00, 0.90]1 study · 195 participantsUngraded
Potassium nitrate/polycarboxylate cement (KNO3/PCa) vs Polycarboxylate cement (PCa) alone
Clinical success (absence of periapical pathology, tenderness to pressure and fistula formation) at 24 months · Adults with asymptomatic vital pulpal exposures from caries · 24 months
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Hodosh 2003 (Analysis 3.1): 9/17 in the KNO3/PCa group and 10/12 in the PCa group developed clinical symptoms requiring endodontic therapy or extraction. No significance test reported for this specific contrast; no…1 study · 29 participantsUngraded
Life (calcium hydroxide pulp-capping material) vs Dycal (calcium hydroxide pulp-capping material)
Clinical symptoms at 12 months · Adults (aged 20 to 60 years, mean 27) with deep carious lesions in permanent teeth (indirect or direct pulp capping,… · 12 months, Indirect pulp capping
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Analysis 2.1 (clinical symptoms at 12 months following indirect pulp capping, Life vs Dycal). Fitzgerald 1991: 151 teeth in 55 patients (analysis at tooth level, not patient level); substantial attrition (11 teeth lost…1 study · 151 participantsUngraded
Direct composite restoration (final restoration) vs Full-coverage metal-ceramic crown
Clinical failure (post dislodgement) · Participants with endodontically-treated permanent premolars restored with a carbon-fibre post (Category III) · 36 months (3 years); dislodgement assessed at 24 months
Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth (2007) · Cochrane
RR 1.85 [0.17, 19.8]1 study · 104 participantsUngraded
Ledermix (corticosteroid/antibiotic pulp-capping cement) vs Zinc oxide eugenol
Clinical success (survival free of symptoms) at 24 months · Adults with asymptomatic teeth with vital carious pulp exposures · 24 months
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Shovelton 1971 (Analysis 1.1): 275 teeth followed for 2 years (235 at 6 months, 160 at 12 months, 85 analysed at 24 months). Success rates 50% to 80%. Ledermix and calcium hydroxide had the highest success rates,…1 study · 275 participantsUngraded
Life (calcium hydroxide pulp-capping material) vs Dycal (calcium hydroxide pulp-capping material)
Clinical symptoms at 12 months · Adults (aged 20 to 60 years, mean 27) with deep carious lesions in permanent teeth (indirect or direct pulp capping,… · 12 months, Direct pulp capping
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Analysis 2.3 (clinical symptoms at 12 months following direct pulp capping, Life vs Dycal). Fitzgerald 1991: 151 teeth in 55 patients (analysis at tooth level, not patient level); substantial attrition (11 teeth lost…1 study · 151 participantsUngraded
Potassium containing toothpaste (5% potassium nitrate) vs Control toothpaste (without potassium)
Tactile sensitivity (method a, ordinal scale) · Healthy human adults (18 years or more) with dentine hypersensitivity from exposed root surfaces · 6 to 8 weeks
Potassium containing toothpastes for dentine hypersensitivity (2006) · Cochrane
MD -0.65 [-1.07, -0.23]1 studyUngraded
Potassium containing toothpaste (5% potassium nitrate) vs Control toothpaste (without potassium)
Thermal sensitivity · Healthy human adults (18 years or more) with dentine hypersensitivity from exposed root surfaces · 6 to 8 weeks
Potassium containing toothpastes for dentine hypersensitivity (2006) · Cochrane
MD -1.10 [-1.64, -0.55]1 studyUngraded
Potassium containing toothpaste (5% potassium nitrate) vs Control toothpaste (without potassium)
Subjective assessment of sensitivity · Healthy human adults (18 years or more) with dentine hypersensitivity from exposed root surfaces · 6 to 8 weeks
Potassium containing toothpastes for dentine hypersensitivity (2006) · Cochrane
SMD -0.67 [-1.44, 0.10]3 studies · 206 participantsUngraded
Potassium containing toothpaste (5% potassium nitrate) vs Control toothpaste (without potassium)
Air blast sensitivity · Healthy human adults (18 years or more) with dentine hypersensitivity from exposed root surfaces · 6 to 8 weeks
Potassium containing toothpastes for dentine hypersensitivity (2006) · Cochrane
SMD -1.25 [-1.65, -0.85]6 studies · 392 participantsUngraded
Potassium containing toothpaste (5% potassium nitrate) vs Control toothpaste (without potassium)
Tactile sensitivity (method b, continuous probe) · Healthy human adults (18 years or more) with dentine hypersensitivity from exposed root surfaces · 6 to 8 weeks
Potassium containing toothpastes for dentine hypersensitivity (2006) · Cochrane
SMD 1.19 [0.79, 1.59]5 studies · 356 participantsUngraded
Fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride mouthrinse
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs) · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.78, 1.00]5 studiesUngraded
Fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride mouthrinse
Proportion of children developing new caries (permanent) · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 0.90 [0.60, 1.37]1 studyUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride mouthrinse alone
Caries increment in permanent teeth: D(M)FS (prevented fraction) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less · Nearest to 3 years
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.05 [-0.05, 0.15]4 studies · 1678 participantsUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride mouthrinse alone
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs / leaving study early) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.67, 1.17]3 studies · 1697 participantsUngraded
Fluoride gel combined with fluoride mouthrinse vs Fluoride gel alone
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs / leaving study early) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.72, 1.40]1 study · 344 participantsUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse, gel or varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste (any combined regimen) vs Fluoride toothpaste alone
Adverse effects (tooth staining and other side effects) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
Adverse-effect data scarcely reported: a stain score in one trial and 'any side effects' in one trial without complete or useable data (stated 'no side effects observed in both groups'). No useful information on tooth…NRUngraded
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Adverse reactions · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Planned outcome; no adverse-reaction data were reported by the included trial.0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride varnish alone
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs / leaving study early) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.22, 2.59]1 study · 196 participantsUngraded
Fluoride gel combined with fluoride mouthrinse vs Fluoride gel alone
Caries increment in permanent teeth: D(M)FS (prevented fraction) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less · Nearest to 3 years
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.23 [0.04, 0.43]2 studies · 497 participantsUngraded
Fluoride varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride toothpaste alone
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs / leaving study early) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 1.29 [0.61, 2.71]2 studies · 294 participantsUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse, gel or varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste (any combined regimen) vs Fluoride toothpaste alone
Enamel fluorosis (adverse effect) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
Fluorosis data have not been reported in any of the trials.0 studiesNo studies
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Pain following treatment · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Planned outcome; pain following treatment was not reported by the included trial (earlier trial publications reported treatment times, not pain).0 studiesNo studies
Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)
Adverse events · People of any age with caries (including demineralisation in non-cavitated carious lesions); the caries may affect any… · To 6 months
Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries (2004) · Cochrane
Baysan 2003 stated that no adverse events were reported to 6 months; no information was provided by Abu-Naba'a 2003 or Abu-Naba'a 2003pilot.1 studyUngraded
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Restoration failure (longevity) · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations · 2 years
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Meijering 1998 (data by restoration, not pooled; no statistical analysis possible). Failures over 2-year follow-up: direct resin composite (n=69) 4 absolute and 14 relative failures; indirect resin composite (n=54) 7…1 study · 123 participantsUngraded
Fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride gel
Caries increment (D(M)FS), permanent teeth · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study · 1 to 3 years (final follow-up)
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.00 [-0.21, 0.21]3 studies · 1256 participantsUngraded
Indirect veneer with no incisal edge reduction vs Indirect veneer with incisal edge reduction (1.5 mm plus short palatal bevel)
Restoration survival (longevity) · Patients receiving indirect laminate veneer restorations on permanent anterior teeth · 2 years
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Meijering 1998 (Table 3): survival percentages by preparation type at 2 years (original/functional/overall) - no incisal edge reduction 98/97/95; incisal reduction 95/90/87. No statistical comparison performed.1 studyUngraded
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Cost of treatment · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Planned outcome; cost of treatment was not reported by the included trial.0 studiesNo studies
Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)
Patient satisfaction · People of any age with caries (including demineralisation in non-cavitated carious lesions); the caries may affect any…
Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries (2004) · Cochrane
Abu-Naba'a 2003 reported participants' state of anxiety, comparing ozone treatment with traditional dental interventions (injection, drilling, filling); because no participant was randomised between ozone and drilling…1 studyUngraded
Fluoride varnish vs Fluoride toothpaste
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs) · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 1.28 [0.37, 4.41]1 studyUngraded
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Patient satisfaction · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations · 2 years
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Meijering 1998 (Table 4): patients satisfied at 2 years - direct resin composite 67%, indirect resin composite 82%. No statistical comparison performed.1 studyUngraded
Direct resin composite veneer vs Porcelain (indirect) veneer
Patient satisfaction · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations · 2 years
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Meijering 1998 (Table 4): patients satisfied at 2 years - direct resin composite 67%, porcelain 93%. No statistical comparison performed.1 studyUngraded