Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

5,762 questions in 263 reviews · Dental caries

current versions
No studies 321 · 5.6%Ungraded 4,450 · 77.2%Very low 455 · 7.9%Low 297 · 5.2%Moderate 200 · 3.5%High 39 · 0.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Disease free survival · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Accelerated/boost vs conventional, disease free survival: all four trials provided data; pooled estimate showed a statistically significant difference in favour of the accelerated/boost schedule, with statistical…4 studies · 1203 participantsUngraded
Split-course radiotherapy vs Accelerated radiotherapy
Locoregional control · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and… · 2 years
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
RR 1.33 [0.67, 2.67]1 study · 110 participantsUngraded
Pre-operative and post-operative radiotherapy vs Post-operative radiotherapy alone
Disease free survival · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 1.13 [0.78, 1.64]1 studyUngraded
Hyperfractionated radiotherapy vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 0.78 [0.68, 0.90]3 studies · 966 participantsUngraded
Split-course radiotherapy vs Accelerated radiotherapy
Disease free survival · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and… · 2 years
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.29, 2.42]1 study · 110 participantsUngraded
Pre-operative and post-operative radiotherapy vs Post-operative radiotherapy alone
Locoregional control · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 1.13 [0.78, 1.64]1 studyUngraded
Neutron radiotherapy vs Conventional photon radiotherapy
Locoregional control · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and… · 5 years
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.69, 1.36]1 studyUngraded
Altered fractionation radiotherapy (hyperfractionated and/or accelerated) vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and… · 5 years, All included studies
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 0.86 [0.76, 0.98]13 studies · 3751 participantsVery low
Accelerated radiotherapy (no split, boost or hyperfractionation) vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Accelerated vs conventional, total mortality: only one trial reported data (Skladowski 2006; IPD available). A statistically significant difference in favour of the altered fractionation was shown (Analysis 1.1). No…1 studyUngraded
Hyperfractionated radiotherapy vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Disease free survival · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Hyperfractionated vs conventional, disease free survival: data available for one trial (Fu 2000); no statistically significant difference (Analysis 1.3). No pooled estimate reported.1 studyUngraded
Lower total dose radiotherapy (67.2 Gy over 5.6 weeks) vs Conventional/standard total dose radiotherapy (72 Gy)
Locoregional control · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 1.13 [0.78, 1.64]1 studyUngraded
Higher total dose radiotherapy (76.8 Gy over 6.4 weeks) vs Conventional/standard total dose radiotherapy (72 Gy)
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 1.08 [0.69, 1.70]1 studyUngraded
Hyperfractionated/accelerated/split-course radiotherapy vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 1.02 [0.90, 1.17]4 studies · 1299 participantsUngraded
Morning radiotherapy vs Afternoon radiotherapy
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and… · 2 years
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [0.74, 1.59]1 study · 216 participantsUngraded
Hyperfractionated/accelerated/split-course radiotherapy vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Disease free survival · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Hyperfractionated/accelerated/split vs conventional, disease free survival: two trials (Fu 2000, Olmi 2003); results contradictory with substantial statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.02, I2 = 82%); no pooled estimate…2 studiesUngraded
Split-course radiotherapy vs Accelerated radiotherapy
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and… · 2 years
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.82, 1.22]1 study · 110 participantsUngraded
Mixed beam (neutron and photon) radiotherapy vs Conventional photon radiotherapy
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 1.12 [0.92, 1.36]1 study · 327 participantsUngraded
Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) vs Conventional or other radiotherapy
Outcome NR · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Discussion: 'There are currently no trials of IMRT in this systematic review' (the PARSPORT trial was underway, expected 2013). No eligible trials of intensity modulated radiotherapy identified.0 studiesNo studies
Hyperfractionated/accelerated radiotherapy vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Disease free survival · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Hyperfractionated/accelerated vs conventional, disease free survival: one trial (Poulsen 2001); no statistically significant difference (Analysis 1.3). No pooled estimate.1 studyUngraded
Neutron radiotherapy vs Conventional photon radiotherapy
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 1.10 [0.90, 1.34]3 studiesUngraded
Accelerated/split-course radiotherapy vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and… · 5 years
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [0.57, 2.43]1 study · 147 participantsUngraded
Hyperfractionated/accelerated split-course radiotherapy vs Accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost
Locoregional control · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Fu 1995: no significant difference in locoregional control; data not presented in a way that allows calculation of an HR.1 study · 75 participantsUngraded
Morning radiotherapy vs Afternoon radiotherapy
Quality of life · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Bjarnason 2009: no statistically significant difference in quality of life scores (data not reported). Morning radiotherapy was associated with significantly less weight loss after 5 months.1 study · 216 participantsUngraded
Morning radiotherapy vs Afternoon radiotherapy
Locoregional control · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 0.92 [0.60, 1.42]1 study · 216 participantsUngraded
Lower total dose radiotherapy (67.2 Gy over 5.6 weeks) vs Conventional/standard total dose radiotherapy (72 Gy)
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 1.38 [0.83, 2.29]1 studyUngraded
Altered fractionation radiotherapy (hyperfractionated and/or accelerated) vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and… · 5 years, Studies at low risk of bias (sensitivity analysis)
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 0.93 [0.80, 1.07]5 studies · 1511 participantsModerate
Pre-operative radiotherapy (plus surgery) vs Surgery alone
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 0.83 [0.64, 1.07]1 studyUngraded
Accelerated radiotherapy (no split, boost or hyperfractionation) vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Locoregional control · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Accelerated vs conventional, locoregional control: one trial (Skladowski 2006); a statistically significant difference in favour of the altered fractionation was shown (Analysis 1.2). No numeric estimate given.1 studyUngraded
Higher total dose radiotherapy (76.8 Gy over 6.4 weeks) vs Conventional/standard total dose radiotherapy (72 Gy)
Locoregional control · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 0.78 [0.55, 1.11]1 studyUngraded
Hyperfractionated/accelerated/split-course radiotherapy vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Locoregional control · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 0.86 [0.74, 1.01]4 studies · 1299 participantsUngraded
Hyperfractionated/accelerated radiotherapy vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 0.87 [0.75, 1.00]4 studies · 1071 participantsUngraded
Pre-operative and post-operative radiotherapy vs Post-operative radiotherapy alone
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 0.67 [0.35, 1.28]1 studyUngraded
Altered fractionation radiotherapy plus chemotherapy vs Chemoradiotherapy with standard (conventional) fractionation
Outcome NR · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Discussion: 'there are no completed trials of altered fractionation plus chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy with standard fractionation.'0 studiesNo studies
Accelerated radiotherapy (no split, boost or hyperfractionation) vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Disease free survival · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Accelerated vs conventional, disease free survival: both trials reported this, but substantial clinical and statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.0004, I2 = 92%) meant a pooled analysis was not reported (Analysis 1.3).2 studiesUngraded
Hyperfractionated/accelerated split-course radiotherapy vs Accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost
Disease free survival · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Fu 1995: no significant difference in disease free survival; data not presented in a way that allows calculation of an HR.1 study · 75 participantsUngraded
Altered fractionation radiotherapy (hyperfractionated and/or accelerated) vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Locoregional control · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 0.79 [0.70, 0.89]11 studiesUngraded
Pre-operative radiotherapy (plus surgery) vs Surgery alone
Locoregional control · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and… · Timing unclear
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.63 [0.28, 1.46]1 studyUngraded
Altered fractionation radiotherapy vs Chemoradiotherapy (concurrent, standard fractionation)
Outcome NR · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
Discussion: altered fractionation radiotherapy 'has not been directly compared to chemoradiotherapy'. No eligible head-to-head trials.0 studiesNo studies
Aesthetic (resin-veneered) crowns vs Conventional metal (stainless steel) crowns
Restoration failure at 6 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 6 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
OR 3.29 [0.12, 89.81]1 study · 22 participantsUngraded
Compomer (Dyract) vs Amalgam (Tytin)
Secondary caries at 24 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 24 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
OR 3.13 [0.12, 80.68]1 study · 48 participantsUngraded
Compomer (Dyract) vs Amalgam (Tytin)
Marginal integrity (cervical) failures at 24 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 24 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
Marginal integrity (cervical) failures at 24 months: odds ratio not estimable - no events recorded at this interval.1 study · 48 participantsUngraded
Compomer (Dyract) vs Amalgam (Tytin)
Surface texture failures at 24 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 24 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
OR 1.00 [0.22, 4.56]1 study · 48 participantsUngraded
Aesthetic (resin-veneered) crowns vs Conventional metal (stainless steel) crowns
Occlusion at 6 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 6 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
Occlusion at 6 months: odds ratio not estimable - no events recorded at the 6-month evaluation.1 study · 22 participantsUngraded
Compomer (Dyract) vs Amalgam (Tytin)
Cervical gaps on bitewing X-rays at 24 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 24 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
OR 1.00 [0.13, 7.75]1 study · 48 participantsUngraded
Aesthetic (resin-veneered) crowns vs Conventional metal (stainless steel) crowns
Proximal contact at 6 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 6 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
Proximal contact at 6 months: odds ratio not estimable - no events recorded at the 6-month evaluation.1 study · 22 participantsUngraded
Dental fillings (restorations) vs Dental extractions
Outcome NR · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · Minimum 6 months follow-up
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
"No studies were found that compared restorations versus extractions or no treatment as an intervention in children with caries in the primary dentition."NRNo studies
Aesthetic (resin-veneered) crowns vs Conventional metal (stainless steel) crowns
Marginal integrity at 6 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 6 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
Marginal integrity at 6 months: odds ratio not estimable - no events recorded at the 6-month evaluation.1 study · 22 participantsUngraded
Resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer) vs Amalgam
Marginal integrity, wear, surface texture, staining and secondary caries (Ryge criteria) at 6-12 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 6-12 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
Marginal integrity, wear, surface texture, axial contour, staining and secondary caries (Ryge criteria) at 6 and 12 months: odds ratios not estimable - no events recorded, implying equal performance of the two materials.1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Compomer (Dyract) vs Amalgam (Tytin)
Marginal integrity (occlusal) failures at 24 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 24 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
OR 10.76 [0.55, 211.78]1 study · 48 participantsUngraded
Compomer (Dyract) vs Amalgam (Tytin)
Radiolucencies on bitewing X-rays at 24 months · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · 24 months
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
OR 4.53 [0.83, 24.65]1 study · 48 participantsUngraded