Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,097 questions · 3,266 findings · 631 reviews

No studies found 430 · 13.2%GRADE not reported 193 · 5.9%Very low 995 · 30.5%Low 904 · 27.7%Moderate 591 · 18.1%High 153 · 4.7%

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 279,100 (5 observational studies) · Participants in non experimental cohort studies on selenium and cancer

It is very uncertain whether highest changes bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 279,100 (5 observational… compared with lowest selenium exposure (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Prostate cancer risk (13 studies) · Participants in non experimental cohort studies on selenium and cancer

It is very uncertain whether highest changes prostate cancer risk No. of participants: 576,667 (21 observational… compared with lowest selenium exposure (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Cancer mortality risk No. of participants: 17,448 (1 RCT) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias

Highest showed no clear difference in cancer mortality risk No. of participants: 17,448 (1 RCT) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Colorectal cancer risk (16 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias

Highest showed no clear difference in colorectal cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Non‐melanoma skin cancer risk No. of participants: 2027 (2 RCTs) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias

Highest showed no clear difference in non‐melanoma skin cancer risk No. of participants: 2027 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Lung cancer risk (17 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias

Highest showed no clear difference in lung cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Breast cancer risk (14 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias

Highest showed no clear difference in breast cancer risk No. of participants: 802 (1 RCT) compared with lowest selenium exposure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias

Highest showed no clear difference in bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Prostate cancer risk (13 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias

Highest showed no clear difference in prostate cancer risk No. of participants: 18,942 (4 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Any cancer risk No. of participants: 76,239 (7 observational studies) · Participants in non experimental cohort studies on selenium and cancer

It is very uncertain whether highest changes any cancer risk No. of participants: 76,239 (7 observational studies) compared with lowest selenium exposure (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High feedback vs low feedback of routine prenatal ultrasound

Maternal anxiety · Pregnant women undergoing routine ultrasound during pregnancy

High feedback showed no clear difference in maternal anxiety ‐ throughout pregnancy compared with low feedback of routine prenatal ultrasound (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

High feedback vs low feedback of routine prenatal ultrasound

Cessation of alcohol · Pregnant women undergoing routine ultrasound during pregnancy

High feedback may leads to higher cessation of alcohol compared with low feedback of routine prenatal ultrasound (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High feedback vs low feedback of routine prenatal ultrasound

Smoking cessation · Pregnant women undergoing routine ultrasound during pregnancy

High feedback may leads to higher cessation of smoking compared with low feedback of routine prenatal ultrasound (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High feedback vs low feedback of routine prenatal ultrasound

Women's views of level of feedback · Pregnant women undergoing routine ultrasound during pregnancy

It is very uncertain whether high feedback changes women's views of level of feedback compared with low feedback of routine prenatal ultrasound (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Death (before hospital discharge) or BPD (supplemental oxygen/respiratory support at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age if born < 32 weeks' gestation, or 28 days if born ≥ 32 weeks' gestation) · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support

Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in death (before hospital discharge) or BPD(supplemental… compared with continuous positive airway pressure (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation

BPD (supplemental oxygen/respiratory support at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age if born < 32 weeks' gestation, or 28 days if born ≥ 32 weeks' gestation) · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support

Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in BPD (supplemental oxygen/respiratory support at 36 weeks'… compared with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation

Treatment failure within 72 hours of trial entry · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support

Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in treatment failure within 72 hours of trial entry compared with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation

Mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of trial entry · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support

Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of trial entry compared with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation

Nasal trauma (during assigned treatment) · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support

Nasal high flow probably leads to lower nasal trauma (during assigned treatment) compared with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review