Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,429 questions · 3,558 findings · 436 reviews

No studies found 660 · 18.5%GRADE not reported 375 · 10.5%Very low 727 · 20.4%Low 887 · 24.9%Moderate 709 · 19.9%High 200 · 5.6%

Sealing using sealant materials vs no treatment

Failure of therapy · Children and/or adults with permanent or primary teeth, vital (sensitive) pulps, and cavitated or dentine carious lesions conventionally…

It is very uncertain whether sealing using sealant materials changes failure of therapy compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin-based fissure sealant vs Fluoride varnish

Safety of sealants and fluoride varnishes (adverse events) · Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
1 finding from 1 review

Resin-based fissure sealant vs Fluoride varnish

Time taken to apply pit and fissure sealant or fluoride varnish · Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Resin-modified glass ionomer fissure sealant vs Fluoride varnish

Progression of dentinal carious lesions into enamel or dentine · Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)

Resin-modified glass ionomer fissure sealant showed no clear difference in progression of dentinal carious lesions into enamel or dentine compared with fluoride varnish; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Resin-based fissure sealant plus fluoride varnish vs Fluoride varnish

Number of visits to the dentist for repair of sealant or fluoride varnish application · Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Resin-based fissure sealant plus fluoride varnish vs Fluoride varnish

Progression of dentinal carious lesions into enamel or dentine · Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Resin-based fissure sealant plus fluoride varnish vs Fluoride varnish

Time taken to apply pit and fissure sealant or fluoride varnish · Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
1 finding from 1 review

Resin-based fissure sealant plus fluoride varnish vs Fluoride varnish

Changes in decayed, missing and filled (DMF) figures at whole-mouth level · Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings for combination antimicrobial susceptibility testing vs conventional treatment (separate testing)

Lung function(FEV1 or FVC L/min or % predicted) · adults and children with pulmonary exacerbation due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings for combination antimicrobial susceptibility testing vs conventional treatment (separate testing)

Length of hospital stay · adults and children with pulmonary exacerbation due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings for combination antimicrobial susceptibility testing vs conventional treatment (separate testing)

Sputum bacterial density (CFU/mL) · adults and children with pulmonary exacerbation due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings for combination antimicrobial susceptibility testing vs conventional treatment (separate testing)

All‐cause mortality · adults and children with pulmonary exacerbation due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Active drug (etanercept or belimumab) with standard therapy vs placebo + standard care

Remission · adults (age 18 years and older) with GPA ANCA‐associated vasculitis or microscopic polyangiitis (only a subset of patients in one study,…

Active drug (etanercept or belimumab) with standard therapy showed no clear difference in remission (number of patients with remission) compared with standard therapy with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Active drug (etanercept or belimumab) with standard therapy vs placebo + standard care

Durable remission · adults (age 18 years and older) with GPA ANCA‐associated vasculitis or microscopic polyangiitis (only a subset of patients in one study,…

Active drug (etanercept or belimumab) with standard therapy showed no clear difference in durable remission compared with standard therapy with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Active drug (etanercept or belimumab) with standard therapy vs placebo + standard care

Major relapse · adults (age 18 years and older) with GPA ANCA‐associated vasculitis or microscopic polyangiitis (only a subset of patients in one study,…

Active drug (etanercept or belimumab) with standard therapy showed no clear difference in major relapse compared with standard therapy with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Active drug (etanercept or belimumab) with standard therapy vs placebo + standard care

Disease flare · adults (age 18 years and older) with GPA ANCA‐associated vasculitis or microscopic polyangiitis (only a subset of patients in one study,…

Active drug (etanercept or belimumab) with standard therapy showed no clear difference in disease flare compared with standard therapy with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Active drug (etanercept or belimumab) with standard therapy vs placebo + standard care

Any adverse event · adults (age 18 years and older) with GPA ANCA‐associated vasculitis or microscopic polyangiitis (only a subset of patients in one study,…

Active drug (etanercept or belimumab) with standard therapy showed no clear difference in any adverse event compared with standard therapy with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review