What do systematic reviews say?

Intervention not reported

• Interventions in outside‐school hours childcare settings for promoting physical activity amongst schoolchildren aged 4… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 141 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Interventions in outside‐school hours childcare settings for promoting physical activity amongst schoolchildren aged 4… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 1 participants
  Moderate

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions in outside‐school hours childcare settings for promoting physical activity amongst schoolchildren aged 4… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions in outside‐school hours childcare settings for promoting physical activity amongst schoolchildren aged 4… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

• Smoking cessation for improving mental health 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  15 studies · 3141 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Smoking cessation for improving mental health 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  34 studies · 7156 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Smoking cessation for improving mental health 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  8 studies · 2829 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids

• Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 810 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids

• Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 810 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids

• Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 810 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids

Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding probably leads to higher successful insertion of intravenous fluid/enteral tube fluid at… compared with intravenous fluids (moderate certainty).

• Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.52 [1.36, 1.69]
  1 study · 617 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids

Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding probably leads to lower change in modality of fluid therapy compared with intravenous fluids (moderate certainty).

• Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.52 [0.38, 0.71]
  1 study · 759 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids

Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding showed no clear difference in local complications (overall): IV line bruising, soreness,… compared with intravenous fluids (moderate certainty).

• Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.65 [0.42, 1]
  1 study · 678 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids

• Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 759 participants
  Moderate

Sealing using sealant materials vs Non-selective carious tissue removal and conventional restoration (CR)

• Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes

  Non-cavitated lesions, primary dentition
  Lesion progression reported narratively: Borges 2012a found 3/26 sealed lesions progressed after 1 year (split-mouth); not pooled and not GRADE-rated.
  1 study
  GRADE not reported

Hall technique vs Non-restorative cavity control (NRCC)

• Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes

  Primary dentition
  Cost-effectiveness reported narratively: HT found more cost-effective than NRCC in primary teeth (Santamaria 2018); not GRADE-rated.
  1 study
  GRADE not reported

Sealing using sealant materials vs no treatment

• Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes

  Non-cavitated lesions, permanent dentition
  Lesion progression reported narratively: da Silveira 2012 found 3/27 lesions progressed after 1 year; not pooled and not GRADE-rated.
  1 study
  GRADE not reported

Hall technique vs Non-restorative cavity control (NRCC)

It is very uncertain whether hall Technique (sealing with a preformed metal crown) changes failure of therapy compared with non-restorative cavity control (NRCC) (very low certainty).

• Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes

  30 months · Cavitated lesions, primary dentition
  OR 0.19 [0.05, 0.74]
  1 study · 84 participants
  Very low

Non-selective carious tissue removal and conventional restoration (CR) vs Non-restorative cavity control (NRCC)

It is very uncertain whether non-selective carious tissue removal and conventional restoration (CR) changes failure of therapy compared with non-restorative cavity control (NRCC) (very low certainty).

• Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes

  30 months · Cavitated lesions, primary dentition
  OR 1.16 [0.5, 2.71]
  1 study · 102 participants
  Very low

Sealing using sealant materials vs Non-selective carious tissue removal and conventional restoration (CR)

It is very uncertain whether sealing using sealant materials changes failure of therapy compared with non-selective carious tissue removal and conventional restoration (CR) (very low certainty).

• Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes

  48 months · Cavitated lesions, permanent dentition
  OR 5.0 [0.51, 49.27]
  1 study · 41 participants
  Very low