Cochrane · systematic review · CD013552
Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis
Gill, PJ, Anwar, MR, Kornelsen, E, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library
Acute Respiratory InfectionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 7 · 100%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding compared to intravenous fluids for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis
Population: health problem or population
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Length of hospital stay ‐ actual Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 810 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Length of hospital stay (theoretical) Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 810 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Duration of time requiring non‐oral fluid therapy (time to resume full oral feeding) Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 810 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Successful insertion of intravenous fluid/enteral tube fluid at first attempt Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids | RR 1.52 [1.36, 1.69] | 1 study · 617 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Change in modality of fluid therapy Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids | RR 0.52 [0.38, 0.71] | 1 study · 759 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Local complications (overall): IV line bruising, soreness, infection, epistaxis, nasal trauma, others Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids | RR 0.65 [0.42, 1] | 1 study · 678 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Parental satisfaction Summary of findings table ‐ Enteral tube feeding vs intravenous fluids | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 759 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |