Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,749 questions · 14,273 findings · 834 reviews

No studies found 3,655 · 25.6%GRADE not reported 2,115 · 14.8%Very low 3,646 · 25.5%Low 3,034 · 21.3%Moderate 1,503 · 10.5%High 320 · 2.2%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Surgical vs non‐surgical treatment

Number of participants sustaining recurrent patellar dislocation · people with lateral patellar dislocation

It is very uncertain whether surgical changes number of participants sustaining recurrent patellar dislocationa compared with non‐surgical treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical vs non‐surgical treatment

Kujala patellofemoral disorders score Scale from: 0 to 100 (higher scores = better function) · people with lateral patellar dislocation

It is very uncertain whether surgical changes knee and physical functiona Measured using the Kujala patellofemoral… compared with non‐surgical treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical vs non‐surgical treatment

Adverse effects of treatment Overall incidence of complications · people with lateral patellar dislocation

It is very uncertain whether surgical changes adverse effects of treatment Overall incidence of complications compared with non‐surgical treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical vs non‐surgical treatment

Patient‐reported knee instabilitya Incidence of patellar subluxation · people with lateral patellar dislocation

It is very uncertain whether surgical changes patient‐reported knee instabilitya Incidence of patellar subluxation compared with non‐surgical treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Engagement of community leaders vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles) · children under 5 years of age

Engagement of community leaders probably leads to higher proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles) compared with routine care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles/MMR) ‐ household monetary incentivef · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study… compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐ service‐level monetary incentiveg · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐… compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐ household + service‐level monetary incentive · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐… compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review