Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,532 questions · 2,642 findings · 483 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 534 · 20.2%GRADE not reported 82 · 3.1%Very low 641 · 24.3%Low 807 · 30.5%Moderate 472 · 17.9%High 106 · 4%

Intervention not reported

Diastolic blood pressure clinical digital sphygmomanometer · adults with or without hypertension
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Withdrawals due to adverse effects · adults with or without hypertension
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Proportion of participants with IOP < 21 mmHg at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Mean IOP change from baseline at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Participant‐reported outcomes related to the ease, convenience, and comfort of instillation at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Physiologic measurements of systemic absorption at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Escalation of therapy at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Mean change in visual fields at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Back School vs short‐wave diathermy at the lowest intensity

Duration of sick‐leave Sick‐leave > 21 days · participants with acute or subacute low‐back pain

It is very uncertain whether back school changes duration of sick‐leave Sick‐leave > 21 days compared with short‐wave diathermy at the lowest intensity (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse outcome: unintended adverse events attributable to the intervention Multimodal/complex intervention, ATCS Plus, IVR, unidirectional ATCS versus various controls · patients with hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review