Intervention not reported
False positives (participants incorrectly classified as having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
108 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Index Test result · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
True positives (participants with tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
4 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
False negatives (participants incorrectly classified as not having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
True negatives (participants without tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
951 participants
High
Intervention not reported
False positives (participants incorrectly classified as having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
44 participants
High
Intervention not reported
False negatives (participants incorrectly classified as not having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
3 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
True negatives (participants without tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
939 participants
High
Intervention not reported
False positives (participants incorrectly classified as having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
56 participants
High
Intervention not reported
Index test result · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
True positives (participants with tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
3 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
False negatives (participants incorrectly classified as not having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
True negatives (participants without tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
871 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Threshold · asymptomatic newborns at the time of pulse oximetry screening
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
95% (less than or less than or equal to) · asymptomatic newborns at the time of pulse oximetry screening
1 finding from 1 review
Economic Outcomes Resources used (staff time, equipment, consumables) · patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes eligible for diabetic retinopathy screening
1 finding from 1 review
Staff/personnel costs; costs of treatment and care; cost of primary care; lost wages and lost productivity · patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes eligible for diabetic retinopathy screening
1 finding from 1 review
Incremental cost‐effectiveness · patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes eligible for diabetic retinopathy screening
1 finding from 1 review
Economic outcomes · patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes eligible for diabetic retinopathy screening
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Informed decision ‐ Numerical risk and categorised risk combined MMIC1 · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests
Personalised risk communication leads to higher informed decision ‐ Numerical risk and categorised risk combined MMIC1 compared with general risk information (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review