Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,973 questions · 3,072 findings · 410 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 559 · 18.2%GRADE not reported 143 · 4.7%Very low 654 · 21.3%Low 833 · 27.1%Moderate 683 · 22.2%High 200 · 6.5%

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Participant‐assessed improvement in rosacea severity · Participants with rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Low

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Proportion of participants with adverse event Pain as · Participants with rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Low

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Physician‐assessed improvement in rosacea severity ‐ not measured · Participants with rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Assessment of erythema or telangiectasia · Participants with rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Moderate

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Lesion count ‐ not measured · Participants with rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Time needed until improvement ‐ not measured · Participants with rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Duration of remission ‐ not measured · Participants with rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Pain · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Acute, subacute and chronic neck pain Intermediate‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

Manipulation showed no clear difference in acute, subacute and chronic neck pain Intermediate‐term compared with mobilisation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 446 participants
Moderate

Manipulation vs mobilisation

FUNCTION AND DISABILITY · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Acute and subacute neck pain Short‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

Manipulation showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Short‐term compared with mobilisation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 176 participants
Moderate

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Participant satisfaction · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Subacute and chronic neck pain Short‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

Manipulation showed no clear difference in subacute and chronic neck pain Short‐term compared with mobilisation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 269 participants
Moderate

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Global Perceived Effect · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Acute and subacute neck pain Intermediate‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

Manipulation showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Intermediate‐term compared with mobilisation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 177 participants
Moderate

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Quality of life · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs exercise

Pain · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs exercise

Acute and subacute neck pain Intermediate‐term · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

Manipulation showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Intermediate‐term compared with exercise (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 182 participants
Moderate

Manipulation vs exercise

Acute and subacute neck pain Long‐term · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

Manipulation showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Long‐term compared with exercise (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
SMD 0.06
1 study · 182 participants
Moderate

Manipulation vs exercise

Function · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found