Partial graft loss · Patients with 3 to 6 mm of residual bone height at the sinus floor
One-stage crestal-approach sinus lift with autogenous bone and 8 mm… showed no clear difference in partial graft loss compared with lateral-window sinus lift with 50% autogenous bone/50% Bio-Oss and…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Implant failure · Patients with 2 to 7 mm of residual alveolar bone height in the edentulous maxillary sinus floor
One-stage lateral sinus lift with monocortical autogenous bone… showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with two-stage lateral sinus lift with autogenous particulate bone (iliac…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Patient preference · Patients undergoing crestal maxillary sinus lift
1 finding from 1 review
Five months after loading, 13 of 15 patients preferred the side treated with the Cosci (rotary) technique; binomial test P = 0.007 (significant). Basis for the review's low-quality-evidence statement that patients may…
1 study · 15 participants
GRADE not reported
Prosthesis failure · Patients undergoing lateral-window maxillary sinus lift
1 finding from 1 review
Rickert 2013 (split-mouth, N = 36): no prosthesis failures in either group.
1 study · 36 participants
GRADE not reported
Implant failure · Patients undergoing one-stage crestal maxillary sinus lift without bone grafts (baseline residual bone height about 6.5 mm)
Hand mallet (osteotomes) showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with electric mallet; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Prosthesis failure · Patients with 3 to 6 mm of residual bone height at the sinus floor
One-stage crestal-approach sinus lift with autogenous bone and 8 mm… showed no clear difference in prosthesis failure compared with lateral-window sinus lift with 50% autogenous bone/50% Bio-Oss and…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Prosthesis failure · Patients with an atrophic maxillary sinus requiring augmentation (1 to 5 mm residual bone height)
Sinus lift with bone graft (granular Bio-Oss) showed no clear difference in prosthesis failure compared with sinus lift without bone graft (Inion resorbable rigid barrier…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Augmentation procedure failure · Patients undergoing lateral-window maxillary sinus lift
1 finding from 1 review
Implant failure · Patients with insufficient bone below the maxillary sinus requiring dental implants
One-stage augmentation (implants placed simultaneously) showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with two-stage augmentation (delayed implant placement); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Complications · Patients undergoing crestal maxillary sinus lift
Osteotomes with mallet (Summers' technique) showed no clear difference in complications compared with rotary instruments (Cosci technique); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Augmentation procedure failure · Patients undergoing one-stage crestal maxillary sinus lift without bone grafts (baseline residual bone height about 6.5 mm)
1 finding from 1 review
Prosthesis failure · Patients with 2 to 7 mm of residual alveolar bone height in the edentulous maxillary sinus floor
One-stage lateral sinus lift with monocortical autogenous bone… showed no clear difference in prosthesis failure compared with two-stage lateral sinus lift with autogenous particulate bone (iliac…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Complications · Patients with an atrophic maxillary sinus requiring augmentation (1 to 5 mm residual bone height)
Sinus lift with bone graft (granular Bio-Oss) showed no clear difference in complications compared with sinus lift without bone graft (Inion resorbable rigid barrier…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.50 [0.01, 9.60]
1 study · 9 participants
GRADE not reported
Implant failure · Patients undergoing lateral-window maxillary sinus lift
1 finding from 1 review
Complication at augmented site · Patients undergoing one-stage crestal maxillary sinus lift without bone grafts (baseline residual bone height about 6.5 mm)
Hand mallet (osteotomes) showed no clear difference in complications at augmented site compared with electric mallet; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Implant failure · Patients with an atrophic posterior maxilla requiring maxillary sinus augmentation
Autogenous bone graft (two-stage lateral sinus lift) showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with bone substitute (anorganic bovine bone / Bio-Oss); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Implant failure · Patients with insufficient bone below the maxillary sinus requiring dental implants
1 finding from 1 review
No statistically significant difference for implant failures. Per trial: Raghoebar 2005 1 failure in the PRP arm, OR 3.67 (0.12 to 113.73), P = 0.46; Torres 2009 (PRP only = 1, no-PRP only = 2), OR 0.50 (0.01 to…
2 studies · 62 participants
GRADE not reported
Prosthesis failure · Patients undergoing two-stage maxillary sinus augmentation
1 finding from 1 review
Lindgren 2012 (split-mouth, 11 patients): prosthesis failures 0/11 versus 0/11; none.
1 study · 11 participants
GRADE not reported
Augmentation procedure failure · Patients with an atrophic maxillary sinus requiring augmentation (1 to 5 mm residual bone height)
Sinus lift with bone graft (granular Bio-Oss) showed no clear difference in augmentation procedure failure compared with sinus lift without bone graft (Inion resorbable rigid barrier…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Complication at augmented site · Patients undergoing lateral-window maxillary sinus lift
Rotary instruments to open the lateral sinus window showed no clear difference in complications at augmented site compared with piezosurgery to open the lateral sinus window; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review