Question · asked by 1 review
Rotary instruments to open the lateral sinus window vs Piezosurgery to open the lateral sinus window: Prosthesis failure
- Population
- Patients undergoing lateral-window maxillary sinus lift
- Intervention
- Rotary instruments to open the lateral sinus window
- Comparison
- Piezosurgery to open the lateral sinus window
- Outcome
- Prosthesis failure
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Rotary instruments to open the lateral sinus window vs Piezosurgery to open the lateral sinus window Prosthesis failure · Patients undergoing lateral-window maxillary sinus lift · 1 year after loading Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes | Rickert 2013 (split-mouth, N = 36): no prosthesis failures in either group. | 1 study · 36 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2014-01 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.