Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing elective pancreatic resections
It is very uncertain whether active drain changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with passive drain following pancreatic surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Wound infection · people undergoing elective pancreatic resections
It is very uncertain whether active drain changes wound infection compared with passive drain following pancreatic surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Drain‐related complications · people undergoing elective pancreatic resections
1 finding from 1 review
Morbidity · people undergoing elective pancreatic resections
It is very uncertain whether active drain changes morbidity compared with passive drain following pancreatic surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Length of hospital stay · people undergoing elective pancreatic resections
It is very uncertain whether active drain changes length of hospital stay compared with passive drain following pancreatic surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality · people undergoing elective pancreatic resections
It is very uncertain whether active drain changes mortality compared with passive drain following pancreatic surgery (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Number of incontinent men within 6 to 12 months ‐ FES versus ExMI · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
It is very uncertain whether treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment changes number of incontinent men within 6 to 12 months ‐ FES versus ExMI compared with another active treatment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incontinence‐specific quality of life · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment showed no clear difference in adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone compared with another active treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Economic analysis using QALY · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐SF UI score) · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · All men after radical prostatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment showed no clear difference in number of incontinent men after 12 months compared with another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐SF UI score) · All men after radical prostatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · All men after radical prostatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of incontinent men after 12 months ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐SF UI score) · All men after radical prostatectomy
1 finding from 1 review