evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

6 questions · 6 findings · 2 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 83.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 16.7%High 0 · 0%

Direct vision entry vs Veress needle entry

Visceral injury (bladder or bowel) · patients undergoing laparoscopy

It is very uncertain whether direct vision entry changes visceral injury (bladder or bowel) compared with veress needle entry (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct vision entry vs open‐entry technique

Visceral injury (bladder or bowel) · patients undergoing laparoscopy

It is very uncertain whether direct vision entry changes visceral injury (bladder or bowel) compared with open‐entry technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Radially expanding (STEP) trocars for primary port entry vs standard (non‐expanding) trocars

Visceral injury (bladder or bowel) · patients undergoing laparoscopy

It is very uncertain whether radially expanding (STEP) trocars for primary port entry changes visceral injury (bladder or bowel) compared with standard (non‐expanding) trocars (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Open‐entry vs closed entry technique

Visceral injury (bladder or bowel) · patients undergoing laparoscopy

It is very uncertain whether open‐entry changes visceral injury (bladder or bowel) compared with closed‐entry technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct trocar entry vs Veress needle entry

Visceral injury (bladder or bowel) · patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

It is very uncertain whether direct trocar entry changes visceral injury (bladder or bowel) compared with veress needle entry (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review