Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 50%High 1 · 50%

Continuous chest compression plus ventilation vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation

Survival to hospital discharge · Patients with non‐trauma related out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

1 finding from 1 review

Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non‐asphyxial… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 23648 participants
Moderate

Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation

Survival to hospital discharge · Patients with non‐trauma related out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

Continuous chest compression alone leads to higher survival to hospital discharge compared with interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non‐asphyxial… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.21 [1.01, 1.46]
3 studies · 3031 participants
High