Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 66.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

ECT plus standard care vs sham‐ECT plus standard care

Service use (short term) ‐ hospitalisation (number readmitted) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia

ECT plus standard care may leads to lower service use (short term) ‐ hospitalisation (number readmitted) compared with sham‐ECT plus standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.29 [0.1, 0.85]
1 study · 25 participants
Low

ECT plus standard care vs antipsychotics plus standard care

Service outcomes: Hospitalisation · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

ECT plus standard care vs usual care

Service outcomes: Hospitalisation · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found