What do systematic reviews say?

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs no treatment/sham

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs a single‐incision sling (mini‐sling)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs a mid‐urethral sling or tape

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 136 participants
  Low

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs drugs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs anterior repair

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs bladder neck (needle) suspension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs laparoscopic colposuspension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs conservative management

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs injectable treatment

It is very uncertain whether traditional suburethral sling operation changes repeat surgery for urinary incontinence ‐ urodynamic stress… compared with injectables (very low certainty).

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.52 [0.05, 5.36]
  1 study · 43 participants
  Very low

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs open abdominal retropubic suspension

Traditional suburethral sling operation leads to lower repeat surgery for urinary incontinence‐stress urinary incontinence… compared with open abdominal retropubic colposuspension (high certainty).

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.15 [0.05, 0.42]
  1 study · 450 participants
  High

One type of traditional sling operation vs another traditional suburethral sling

One type of traditional sling operation may leads to lower repeat surgery for urinary incontinence at first year Fascial sling… compared with another traditional sling operation (low certainty).

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.04 [0, 0.61]
  1 study · 113 participants
  Low