Question · asked by 1 review

One type of traditional sling operation vs another traditional suburethral sling: Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence

One type of traditional sling operation may leads to lower repeat surgery for urinary incontinence at first year Fascial sling… compared with another traditional sling operation (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
One type of traditional sling operation vs another traditional sling operation
Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence at first year Fascial sling vs Pelvicol sling · women with urinary incontinence
One type of traditional sling operation may leads to lower repeat surgery for urinary incontinence at first year Fascial sling… compared with another traditional sling operation (low certainty).
Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.04 [0, 0.61]1 study · 113 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women
2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.