Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 25%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 75%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Erythromycin vs nasogastric tube lavage

Rebleeding · people with acute UGIH

It is very uncertain whether erythromycin changes rebleeding compared with nasogastric tube lavage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.77 [0.4, 1.49]
1 study · 169 participants
Very low

Erythromycin vs placebo

Rebleeding · people with acute UGIH

It is very uncertain whether erythromycin changes rebleeding compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.63 [0.13, 2.9]
2 studies · 195 participants
Very low

Erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage vs no intervention/placebo plus nasogastric tube lavage

Rebleeding · people with acute UGIH

It is very uncertain whether erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage changes rebleeding compared with no intervention/placebo plus nasogastric tube lavage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.13 [0.63, 2.02]
1 study · 169 participants
Very low

Erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage vs metoclopramide plus nasogastric tube lavage

Rebleeding · people with acute UGIH

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found