Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

5 questions · 5 findings · 3 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 20%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 20%Low 1 · 20%Moderate 2 · 40%High 0 · 0%

Endometrial resection or ablation vs minimally invasive hysterectomy

Quality of life · heavy menstrual bleeding

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 145 participants
Moderate

Endometrial resection or ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy

Quality of life SF‐36 at 2 years – general health perception · heavy menstrual bleeding

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 209 participants
Low

Endometrial resection or ablation vs open hysterectomy

Quality of life SF‐36 at 2 years – general health perception · HMB

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 155 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Quality of life ‐ not reported · health problem or population

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

LNG‐IUS vs endometrial ablation

Quality of life · heavy menstrual bleeding

1 finding from 1 review

Progestogen‐releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 33 participants
Very low