Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews · Neuromuscular

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Absorbable vs non‐absorbable sutures

DASH hand function score at 3 months Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 100, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 100 represents maximum impairment in hand function)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Absorbable versus non‐absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Absorbable vs non‐absorbable sutures

Postoperative hand function (2 weeks postoperatively) Mean CTS‐FSS score (scale 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate worse function)

1 finding from 1 review

Absorbable versus non‐absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 36 participants
Very low