evidencegaps
Search

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

16 questions · 16 findings · 6 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 6 · 37.5%GRADE not reported 1 · 6.3%Very low 4 · 25%Low 3 · 18.8%Moderate 2 · 12.5%High 0 · 0%

Effects of practice‐based interprofessional collaboration (IPC) interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes vs usual care

Patient health outcomes · health and social care professionals involved in the delivery of health services and patient care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of practice‐based interprofessional collaboration (IPC) interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes vs alternative IPC intervention

Patient health outcomes · health and social care professionals involved in the delivery of health services and patient care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Patient education vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Desirable patient health outcomes (0‐3 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient education interventions showed no clear difference in desirable patient health outcomes (0‐3 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient‐reported health information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Desirable patient health outcomes (0‐3 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

It is very uncertain whether patient‐reported health information interventions changes desirable patient health outcomes (0‐3 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Desirable patient health outcomes (3‐12 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient information interventions showed no clear difference in desirable patient health outcomes (3‐12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Undesirable patient health outcomes · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

It is very uncertain whether patient information interventions changes undesirable patient health outcomes (0‐12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings for the main comparison: comprehensive care programmes vs usual care

Parent health, functioning, and quality of life Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (higher scores = more of the outcome of interest, which can mean improvement or deterioration depending on the outcome) · children with medical complexity
1 finding from 1 review