Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews · Dental caries

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 50%High 0 · 0%

Responsive complementary feeding (RCF) vs Other models of complementary feeding (traditional/non-responsive CF)

Overweight/obesity risk · Healthy, term-born, normal-birth-weight infants aged 4-24 months (breastfed and/or formula-fed) in Western industrialized countries

Responsive complementary feeding probably reduces the risk of overweight/obesity versus other feeding models (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.71; moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Complementary Feeding Caregivers' Practices and Growth, Risk of Overweight/Obesity, and Other Non-Communicable… 2022 All outcomes
Follow-up to 3 years · Outpatient care in Western industrialized (European/Anglo-Saxon) countries
RR 0.41 [0.24, 0.71]
2 studies · 478 participants
Moderate

Non-responsive complementary feeding (NRCF) vs Other models of complementary feeding

Overweight/obesity risk · Healthy, term-born, normal-birth-weight infants aged 4-24 months (breastfed and/or formula-fed) in Western industrialized countries

Non-responsive complementary feeding showed no significant association with overweight/obesity across observational studies (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Complementary Feeding Caregivers' Practices and Growth, Risk of Overweight/Obesity, and Other Non-Communicable… 2022 All outcomes
Follow-up interval 15-20 months · Outpatient care in Western industrialized (European/Anglo-Saxon) countries
NRCF, risk of overweight and obesity (observational; follow up interval 15 to 20 months; assessed with % overweight/obesity, BMIz, delta-BMI, skinfold): No significant association for all comparisons (for documented…
4 studies
Very low