Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Heart

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 28.6%Low 5 · 71.4%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

[Radial] B‐mode ultrasound vs modified B‐mode ultrasound

Overall success rate · adults requiring radial artery catheterisation

[Radial] B‐mode ultrasound showed no clear difference in overall success rate compared with modified B‐mode ultrasound (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.93 [0.86, 1.01]
2 studies · 153 participants
Low

[Radial] B‐mode ultrasound vs Doppler assistance

Overall success rate · adults requiring radial artery catheterisation

[Radial] B‐mode ultrasound showed no clear difference in overall success rate compared with doppler assistance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.13 [0.99, 1.29]
1 study · 493 participants
Low

[Radial] B‐mode ultrasound vs near‐infrared laser guidance

Overall success rate · adults requiring radial artery catheterisation

It is very uncertain whether [Radial] B‐mode ultrasound changes overall success rate compared with near‐infrared laser guidance (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.5 [0.27, 8.45]
1 study · 72 participants
Very low

[Radial] B‐mode ultrasound guidance vs palpation and landmarks

Overall success rate · adults requiring radial artery catheterisation

[Radial] B‐mode ultrasound guidance may leads to higher overall success rate compared with palpation and landmarks (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.11 [1.06, 1.16]
28 studies · 4955 participants
Low

[Radial] In‐plane B‐mode ultrasound vs out‐of‐plane B‐mode ultrasound

Overall success rate · adults requiring radial artery catheterisation

[Radial] In‐plane B‐mode ultrasound showed no clear difference in overall success rate compared with out‐of‐plane B‐mode ultrasound (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.96, 1.05]
8 studies · 1051 participants
Low

[Radial] Dynamic out‐of‐plane B‐mode ultrasound vs out‐of‐plane B‐mode ultrasound

Overall success rate · adults requiring radial artery catheterisation

It is very uncertain whether [Radial] Dynamic out‐of‐plane B‐mode ultrasound changes overall success rate compared with static out‐of‐plane B‐mode ultrasound (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.07 [0.92, 1.25]
1 study · 131 participants
Very low

[Radial] Oblique‐axis in‐plane B‐mode ultrasound vs long‐axis in‐plane B‐mode ultrasound

Overall success rate · adults requiring radial artery catheterisation

[Radial] Oblique‐axis in‐plane B‐mode ultrasound may leads to higher overall success rate compared with long‐axis in‐plane B‐mode ultrasound (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.27 [1.05, 1.53]
2 studies · 215 participants
Low