evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

5 questions · 5 findings · 3 reviews · Pregnancy and Childbirth

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 40%Low 2 · 40%Moderate 1 · 20%High 0 · 0%

Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes

Neonatal seizures · women in established labour and their babies.

It is very uncertain whether intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal… changes neonatal seizures compared with routine Pinard (outcomes (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) vs routine Pinard (outcomes

Neonatal seizures · women in established labour and their babies.

Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal… may leads to lower neonatal seizures compared with routine Pinard (outcomes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes

Neonatal seizures · women in established labour and their babies.

It is very uncertain whether intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal… changes seizures in the neonatal period compared with routine Pinard (outcomes (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Admission cardiotocography vs intermittent auscultation

Neonatal seizures · Low risk pregnant women. All of the women were in labour.

Admission cardiotocography showed no clear difference in incidence of seizures in the neonatal period compared with intermittent auscultation (low‐risk women) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review