Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 1 · 25%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 50%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Mean logMAR visual acuity at 1‐year · People with glaucoma

It is very uncertain whether aqueous shunts changes mean logMAR visual acuity at 1‐year compared with trabeculectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Aqueous shunts for glaucoma 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 0.12
3 studies · 380 participants
Very low

Mean logMAR visual acuity at 1‐year · People with glaucoma

It is very uncertain whether ahmed implant changes mean logMAR visual acuity at 1‐year compared with molteno implant (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Aqueous shunts for glaucoma 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 0.08
1 study · 57 participants
Very low

Mean logMAR visual acuity at 1‐year · People with glaucoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Aqueous shunts for glaucoma 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mean logMAR visual acuity at 1‐year · People with glaucoma

Ahmed implant showed no clear difference in mean logMAR visual acuity at 1‐year compared with baerveldt implant (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Aqueous shunts for glaucoma 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 501 participants
Low