Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 75%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

SDAC vs no intervention

Incidence of adverse events · first aid in patients with acute oral poisoning (paracetamol or not specified)

1 finding from 1 review

First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 476 participants
Very low

SDAC vs syrup of ipecac

Incidence of adverse events · first aid in patients with acute oral poisoning (anti‐inflammatory drugs, analgesics or psychotropic drugs)

It is very uncertain whether SDAC changes incidence of adverse events compared with syrup of ipecac (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.24 [0.26, 5.83]
1 study · 34 participants
Very low

SDAC + hospital intervention vs hospital intervention

Incidence of adverse events · first aid in patients with acute oral poisoning (not specified, tricyclic antidepressants, combinations of different drugs or yellow…

1 finding from 1 review

First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 4904 participants
Very low

MDAC + hospital intervention vs SDAC + hospital intervention

Incidence of adverse events · first aid in patients with acute oral poisoning (carbamazepine, yellow oleander, or combinations of different drugs)

MDAC + hospital intervention may leads to higher incidence of adverse events compared with SDAC + hospital intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Peto OR 3.55 [1.85, 6.79]
2 studies · 3476 participants
Low