Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews · Emergency and Critical Care

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 50%High 1 · 50%

Femoral vs subclavian insertion: short‐term catheterization

Immediate mechanical complications ‐ Major mechanical complications · critically ill patients

Femoral showed no clear difference in immediate mechanical complications ‐ Major mechanical complications compared with subclavian insertion: short‐term catheterization (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.5 [0.09, 2.67]
1 study · 289 participants
High

Femoral vs internal jugular insertion: short‐term catheterization

Immediate mechanical complications ‐ Major mechanical complications · critically ill patients who were expected to require support with renal replacement therapy

Femoral showed no clear difference in immediate mechanical complications ‐ Major mechanical complications compared with internal jugular insertion: short‐term catheterization (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.33 [0.03, 3.16]
1 study · 736 participants
Moderate