Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC genotype of AMELX rs2106416 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC model: OR 1.83, 95% CI 0.47-7.06); certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC + CT genotype of ENAM rs3796703 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC + CT model: OR 2.90, 95% CI 0.92-9.12); certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 0.90 (95% CI 0.23 to 3.63).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 0.59 (95% CI 0.16 to 2.11).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between T allele vs C allele of AMELX rs2106416 and dental caries susceptibility (T vs C model: OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.16-2.11); certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between CT genotype vs CC genotype of ENAM rs3796703 and dental caries susceptibility (CT vs CC model: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.23-3.48) in the Ethnicity: Asian subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC genotype of ENAM rs3796703 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC model: OR 5.22, 95% CI 0.25-108.96) in the Ethnicity: Asian subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Age group: Children (n=4) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.03 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.33).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.03 [0.80, 1.33]
4 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 5.12 (95% CI 0.09 to 278.85).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 5.12 [0.09, 278.85]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 1.67 (95% CI 0.44 to 6.34).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.14 (95% CI 0.56 to 2.29).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.14 [0.56, 2.29]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between CT + TT genotype (T-allele carriers) vs CC genotype of ENAM rs3796703 and dental caries susceptibility (CT + TT vs CC model: OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.23-3.63); certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Mixed (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.03 (95% CI 0.28 to 3.75).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.03 [0.28, 3.75]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC + CT genotype of AMELX rs6639060 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC + CT model: OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.42-2.39) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 5.22 (95% CI 0.25 to 108.96).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 5.22 [0.25, 108.96]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.00 (95% CI 0.12 to 8.23).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.00 [0.12, 8.23]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 1.03 (95% CI 0.28 to 3.75).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.03 [0.28, 3.75]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 1.03 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.33).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Mixed (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.95 (95% CI 0.40 to 2.25).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.95 [0.40, 2.25]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.00 (95% CI 0.42 to 2.39).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.00 [0.42, 2.39]
1 study
GRADE not reported