Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images vs conventional incubation and assessment

Clinical pregnancy · couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology

TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy compared with conventional incubation and assessment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Time‐lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.06 [0.79, 1.41]
4 studies · 875 participants
Low

TLS utilising embryo selection software vs TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images

Clinical pregnancy · couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology

It is very uncertain whether TLS utilising embryo selection software changes clinical pregnancy compared with TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Time‐lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.97 [0.67, 1.42]
2 studies · 463 participants
Very low