Intravitreal dexamethasone implant 0.7 mg vs sham
Change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) · macular edema in diabetes
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 701 participantsModerate
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
6 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews · Eyes and Vision
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 16.7%Low 2 · 33.3%Moderate 3 · 50%High 0 · 0%
Intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant 0.19 mg vs sham
Change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) · macular edema in diabetes
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 560 participantsModerate
Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg vs sham
Visual acuity · macular edema in diabetes
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedLow
Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg vs macular laser
Change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) · macular edema in diabetes
It is very uncertain whether intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg changes change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) compared with macular laser (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- MD 0.02Studies not reportedVery low
Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg vs antiVEGF
Change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) · macular edema in diabetes
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsLow
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant 0.7 mg vs antiVEGF
Change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) · macular edema in diabetes
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedModerate