Amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with vaginal/intracervical prostaglandins (low certainty).
Amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with intravenous oxytocin/amniotomy (low certainty).
Amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with vaginal/oral misoprostol (low certainty).
Amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with no treatment/sham (moderate certainty).
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping (low certainty).
Labour induction probably leads to lower caesarean section compared with expectant management (maternal outcomes) (moderate certainty).
Acupuncture showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with usual care (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether acupuncture changes caesarean section compared with no treatment (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether acupuncture changes caesarean section compared with water injection (very low certainty).
Acupressure probably leads to lower caesarean section compared with sham control (moderate certainty).
Acupressure showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with usual care (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether acupressure changes caesarean section compared with combined control (very low certainty).
Acupuncture showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with sham control (low certainty).
Additional support probably leads to lower caesarean section compared with usual care during pregnancy (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether self‐monitoring at home changes caesarean section compared with hospitalisation (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether pre‐prandial changes caesarean section compared with post‐prandial glucose monitoring (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether automated telemedicine monitoring changes caesarean section compared with conventional (very low certainty).
Continuous glucose monitoring showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with intermittent glucose monitoring (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether constant CGM changes caesarean section compared with intermittent CGM (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether self‐monitoring changes caesarean section compared with a different type of self‐monitoring (very low certainty).