evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

6 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Oral Health

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 6 · 85.7%Moderate 1 · 14.3%High 0 · 0%

1.23% APF gel vs no treatment

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

1.23% APF gel was probably more effective than no treatment for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.79 to 2.54; moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

1.23% APF gel vs Sealant

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

1.23% APF gel may not differ from Sealant for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.41; low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

1.23% APF gel vs Fluoride varnish

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

1.23% APF gel may not differ from 5% NaF varnish for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.4; low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

1.23% APF gel vs Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

1.23% APF gel may be less effective than Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.99; low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

1.23% APF gel vs Sealants plus fluoride varnish (with or without restorations)

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

1.23% APF gel may be less effective than Sealant + 5% NaF varnish for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.92; low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing vs 1.23% APF gel

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing may not differ from 1.23% APF gel for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.22; low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review