evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Oral Health

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 2 · 66.7%High 0 · 0%

1.23% APF gel vs CPP-ACP

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface (primary and permanent teeth)

1.23% APF gel was probably more effective than 10% CPP-ACP paste for arrest or reversal of any-coronal carious lesions (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.83 to 2.61; moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

1.23% APF gel vs no treatment

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface (primary and permanent teeth)

1.23% APF gel was probably more effective than no treatment for arrest or reversal of any-coronal carious lesions (RR 2.25, 95% CI 2 to 2.53; moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

1.23% APF gel vs Fluoride varnish

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface (primary and permanent teeth)

1.23% APF gel may not differ from 5% NaF varnish for arrest or reversal of any-coronal carious lesions (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.29; low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review