Monotherapy vs combination therapy
Monotherapy showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with combination therapy (moderate certainty).
- OR 0.93 [0.68, 1.26]2 studies · 921 participantsModerate
Monotherapy showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with combination therapy (moderate certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether ranolazine (monotherapy) changes adverse events incidence compared with placebo (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings of metformin monotherapy for adults with type 2… changes serious adverse events (SAE) compared with thiazolidinediones (very low certainty).
Summary of findings: pioglitazone monotherapy showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (N) compared with no intervention (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐resistant recurrent EOC: PARPi… changes any severe adverse events (grade 3 or higher) (G3+ SevAE) compared with chemotherapy (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether combination therapy changes serious adverse events compared with monotherapy (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether combination with potassium‐sparing diuretics changes serious adverse events compared with monotherapy (very low certainty).
Usual care showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with immunosuppressive withdrawal after monotherapy (low certainty).
Combination terbinafine plus azole showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with terbinafine monotherapy (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether VGB changes adverse events Visual field defects compared with CBZ monotherapy (very low certainty).